QFT S-matrix explanations are incomprehensible

In summary, in quantum field theory, scattering processes can be described using wavepackets or planewaves. Wavepackets are used when dealing with finite energy systems, while planewaves are used for systems with infinite energy. The S-matrix operator is used to calculate the scattering amplitude for planewaves, but it can also be used to describe the scattering of wavepackets by expanding them into a linear combination of planewaves. The linearity of quantum mechanics allows us to understand the scattering process by considering each plane wave separately. This concept can also be applied in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.
  • #1
jostpuur
2,116
19
TL;DR Summary
I've failed to understand S-matrix explanations. Does anyone feel like understanding them?
The first look at a scattering process is something like this: We define an initial state

[tex]
|\textrm{in}\rangle = \int dp_1dp_2 f_{\textrm{in,1}}(p_1) f_{\textrm{in,2}}(p_2) a_{p_1}^{\dagger} a_{p_2}^{\dagger} |0\rangle
[/tex]

Here [itex]f_{\textrm{in,1}}[/itex] and [itex]f_{\textrm{in,2}}[/itex] are wavefunctions that define some wavepackets that are about collide. Schrodinger equation will determine what happens, so we define an out state as

[tex]
|\textrm{out}\rangle = e^{-\frac{it}{\hbar}H} |\textrm{in}\rangle
[/tex]

If it turns out at that N particles fly out from the collision as some wavepackets, then something like

[tex]
|\textrm{out}\rangle \approx \int dq_1 dq_2 \cdots dq_N f_{\textrm{out,1}}(q_1) f_{\textrm{out,2}}(q_2)\cdots f_{\textrm{out,N}}(q_N) a_{q_1}^{\dagger} a_{q_2}^{\dagger}\cdots a_{q_N}^{\dagger}|0\rangle
[/tex]

is true. So far I feel like I understand what this all means. However, in the fully developed QFT the scattering is not handled like above. Instead we define an initial state as

[tex]
|\textrm{in}\rangle = |p_1,p_2\rangle = a_{p_1}^{\dagger} a_{p_2}^{\dagger} |0\rangle
[/tex]

So instead of wavepackets we wave planewaves that extend to infinities. Then we have an S-matrix operator that works so that it will give an amplitude for N particles flying out as

[tex]
\langle q_1, q_2,\cdots, q_N|S|p_1,p_2\rangle
[/tex]

What confuses me about this is that planewaves cannot really collide, can they? Wavepackets are something can actually collide, but planewaves are somekind of artificial tool? So how do you make the S-matrix operator work so that it makes the planewaves collide?

One formula for S-matrix is

[tex]
S = \lim_{t_{\textrm{B}}\to\infty} \lim_{t_{\textrm{A}}\to -\infty} e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}t_{\textrm{B}}H_0} e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}(t_{\textrm{B}}-t_{\textrm{A}})H}e^{-\frac{i}{\hbar}t_{\textrm{A}}H_0}
[/tex]

It is nice that a formula exists, but I still don't understand that what calculations turn the wavepackets into planewaves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jostpuur said:
What confuses me about this is that planewaves cannot really collide, can they?
Sure. Why not? Whether this has any nontrivial outcome depends on whether there's an interaction term in the total Hamiltonian.

jostpuur said:
Wavepackets are something can actually collide, but planewaves are somekind of artificial tool?
Wavepackets can be expressed as a linear combination of planewaves (as in Fourier theory).

jostpuur said:
I still don't understand that what calculations turn the wavepackets into planewaves.
If we can compute a general formula for the scattering of any (combination of) incoming planewaves into any combination of outgoing planewaves then we have a theory that can be compared with experiment.

One of the early chapters in Peskin& Schroeder has a section on how physically realistic beams (like in an accelerator) are modeled in these terms, and then how to compute scattering cross sections therefrom.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Demystifier and topsquark
  • #3
jostpuur said:
What confuses me about this is that planewaves cannot really collide, can they?
This is not necessarily related to QFT, the same issue arises also in nonrelativistic QM. I would suggest you to first try to understand it in this simpler context.

The crucial insight is the fact that QM is linear. So to understand how a wave packet scatters, you can expand the packet into plane waves and consider each plane wave separately. A nice analysis can be found e.g. in the book Bohm and Hiley, The Undivided Universe, Sec. 5.2.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

FAQ: QFT S-matrix explanations are incomprehensible

What is the S-matrix in Quantum Field Theory (QFT)?

The S-matrix, or scattering matrix, in Quantum Field Theory is a mathematical construct that describes how the initial state of a physical system evolves into the final state after a scattering process. It encapsulates all the probabilities of different possible outcomes of particle interactions.

Why do some people find S-matrix explanations in QFT incomprehensible?

Many people find S-matrix explanations in QFT incomprehensible due to the complex mathematical formalism involved, including advanced calculus, linear algebra, and tensor operations. Additionally, the abstract nature of quantum field interactions and the necessity to understand both quantum mechanics and special relativity can make the concept challenging to grasp.

What are the key mathematical tools required to understand the S-matrix in QFT?

To understand the S-matrix in QFT, one needs to be familiar with several mathematical tools, including Feynman diagrams, perturbation theory, complex analysis, and group theory. Proficiency in these areas allows one to follow the derivations and computations that lead to the formulation of the S-matrix.

How can one improve their understanding of S-matrix explanations in QFT?

Improving understanding of S-matrix explanations in QFT involves a combination of studying foundational texts, such as "Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schroeder, working through problem sets, and seeking guidance from knowledgeable instructors or peers. Engaging with academic papers and attending lectures or seminars can also provide deeper insights.

Are there any simplified resources or analogies to help understand the S-matrix in QFT?

Yes, there are several resources aimed at simplifying the concepts of the S-matrix in QFT. Introductory textbooks, online courses, and educational videos often use analogies and visual aids to make the abstract concepts more accessible. Analogies such as comparing particle interactions to waves interfering or using simplified Feynman diagrams can help build intuition before diving into the rigorous mathematics.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top