QM: Writing time evolution as sum over energy eigenstates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the time evolution operator ##\hat{U}(t)## for a 1-D harmonic oscillator in terms of its energy eigenstates. The initial state is given as ##|\Psi(0)\rangle = |j\rangle##, and the Hamiltonian is defined as ##\hat{H} = \sum_j |j\rangle E_j \langle j|## with energy eigenvalues ##E_j = \hbar\omega(\frac{1}{2}+j)##. Participants are encouraged to derive the form of ##\hat{U}(t)## based on this initial state. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the Hamiltonian and the time evolution operator in quantum mechanics. The thread seeks clarity on how to represent ##\hat{U}(t)## as a sum over energy eigenstates.
Muizz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a 1-D harmonic oscilator with angular velocity ##\omega## and eigenstates ##|j>## and let the state at ##t=0## be given by ##|\Psi(0)>##. We write ##\Psi(t) = \hat{U}(t)\Psi(0)##. Write ##\hat{U}(t)## as sum over energy eigenstates.

I've previously shown that ##\hat{H} = \sum_j |j>E_j<j|## with ##E_j = \hbar\omega(\frac12+j)## (part one of the exercise I got this from) but with this second part I'm drawing a complete blank. Any help would be hugely appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Make life simple and imagine ##|\Psi(0)\rangle = |j\rangle ##.
What would ##\hat U(t) ## look like in that case ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K