MHB Quadratic equations ( solving for zeros/roots) trickey

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the quadratic equation y = -2x^2 + 3x + 20 for its zeros. The initial attempt involved factoring and led to incorrect roots of x = 8 and x = -5. The correct approach involves factoring the equation as -(2x^2 - 3x - 20) and using grouping to arrive at the factors (x - 4)(2x + 5). This results in the correct zeros of x = 4 and x = -5/2. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing when to apply factoring techniques effectively.
miller1991
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
−2x^2+3x+20why is this equation so special it is in standard form, and when i solve for zeros
i factor down to

-1( 2x^2-3x-20)

factor
( 2x^2-3x-20)

factor by grouping 2(-20)=-40 what numbers multiple to equal -40 and add to equal -3

-8(5) = -40
-8+5= -3

and then just to find zeros the next step would be
(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5 BUT
thats not right apparently the answer is

x=4 x = -5/2

the answer i got here

(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5

is meant to be -1(2x+5)(x-4)

which gives
x=4 x = -5/2 but like 5+-4 =1 don't even equal -3

apparently if i use the huge equation to solve for zeros that works but
why did (2x+5)(x-4) using this work, and how to i recognize when to use it like that
and i don't even know where they pulled the 5 and -4 fromdoes anyone know why when solving for zeros
y=-2x^2 +3x+20
is a tricky question
p.s
originally the question was solve zeros for
y=3x+20 -2x^2
but putting it in standard form was easy and i don't think that messes with the final answer
thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
miller1991 said:
factor by grouping 2(-20)=-40 what numbers multiple to equal -40 and add to equal -3

-8(5) = -40
-8+5= -3

and then just to find zeros the next step would be
(x-8) (x+5)
x=8 x=-5

You have the right idea!
You are trying to factor
$-2x^2+3x+20$
Factor out the negative (like you did).
$-(2x^2-3x-20)$
Then you determined the values you are working with are 8 and -5. That tells you how to "re-write" your equation so that is set up in a way that you can factor by grouping.
$2x^2-3x-20 = 2x^2+5x-8x-20$
Now factor by grouping.
$2x^2+5x-8x-20 = x(2x+5)-4(2x+5)=(x-4)(2x+5)$
Giving,
$x=4, x=-\frac{5}{2}$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top