Quantized Charge Problem, Why is this right?

In summary, the correct equation for calculating the number of coulombs of positive charge in 250 cm^3 of neutral water is q = (N_A V_w ρ_w)/(2M_H + 1M_O) * (2Z_H + 1Z_O) * q_p. The equation q = (m_w/m_p) * q_p and q = (V_w ρ_w/m_p) * q_p are incorrect because they assume that the mass of the water is solely from protons, which is not the case.
  • #1
PFStudent
170
0

Homework Statement



26. Calculate the number of coulombs of positive charge in 250 [itex]cm^3[/itex] of (neutral) water. (Hint: A hydrogen atom contains one proton; an oxygen atom contains eight protons.)

Homework Equations



[tex]
q = n_{e}e, n_{e} = \pm1, \pm 2, \pm 3,...,
[/tex]

e [itex]\equiv[/itex] elementary charge

[tex]
e = 1.60217646{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}x{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}10^{-19}
[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]
q = n_{e}e, n_{e} = \pm1, \pm 2, \pm 3,...,
[/tex]

[itex]n_{p} \equiv[/itex] number of protons
[itex]q_{p} \equiv[/itex] charge on a single proton

[tex]
q_{p} = +e
[/tex]

[tex]
q = \left(n_{p}\right)\left(q_{p}\right)
[/tex]

Z [itex]\equiv[/itex] Atomic Number (Number of Protons)
m [itex]\equiv[/itex] mass
M [itex]\equiv[/itex] Molar Mass ([kg]/[mols])

[tex]
\rho_{w} = \frac{m_{w}}{V_{w}}
[/tex]

[tex]
n_{p} = \frac{m_{w}}{m_{H_{2}O}} \cdot \frac{Z_{H_{2}O }}{1}
[/tex]

[tex]
n_{p} = \frac{m_{w}}{\left(2m_{H}+1m_{O}\right)}} \cdot \frac{\left(2Z_{H}+1Z_{O}\right)}{1}
[/tex]

[tex]
q = \left(\frac{\left(V_{w}\rho_{w}\right)}{2m_{H}+1m_{O}} \cdot \frac{2Z_{H}+1Z_{O}}{1}\right)q_{p}
[/tex]

[tex]
q = \left(\frac{V_{w}\rho_{w}}{2\left(\frac{M_{H}}{N_{A}}\right)+1\left(\frac{M_{O}}{N_{A}}\right)} \cdot \frac{2Z_{H}+1Z_{O}}{1}\right)q_{p}
[/tex]

[tex]
q = \left(\frac{N_{A}V_{w}\rho_{w}}{2M_{H}+1M_{O}} \cdot \frac{2Z_{H}+1Z_{O}}{1}\right)q_{p}
[/tex]

The above equation yields the correct solution, however my question is why is this right as opposed to the following?

[tex]
q = \left(\frac{m_{w}}{m_{p}}\right)q_{p}
[/tex]

[tex]
q = \left(\frac{V_{w}\rho_{w}}{m_{p}}\right)q_{p}
[/tex]

Why is the previous equation wrong?

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The last equation assumes that the mass of the water is made entirely from protons which of course is not true.
 
  • #3


As a scientist, it is important to understand the concept of quantized charge and how it applies to this problem. In this case, we are dealing with the charge on protons, which is a fundamental unit of charge and is quantized in nature. This means that it can only exist in discrete, integer multiples of a certain value (in this case, the elementary charge e). Therefore, when calculating the charge in a certain volume of water, we must take into account the number of protons present, which is a whole number, and not just the mass or volume of the water. This is why the first equation, which takes into account the number of protons, is the correct one.

The second equation, which only considers the mass or volume of the water, does not take into account the quantized nature of charge and therefore does not yield the correct solution. In order to accurately calculate the charge, we must consider the number of protons, which is a discrete value.

In conclusion, the first equation is correct because it takes into account the quantized nature of charge and the discrete value of the number of protons in the water sample.
 

FAQ: Quantized Charge Problem, Why is this right?

What is the Quantized Charge Problem?

The Quantized Charge Problem refers to the observation that electric charge is always found in discrete, quantized amounts. This means that the charge of an object is always a multiple of a fundamental unit of charge, which is the charge of a single electron.

Why is the Quantized Charge Problem considered to be a problem?

This is considered a problem because according to classical physics, charge should be able to exist in any amount, not just discrete amounts. This is in contrast to other physical quantities like mass or energy, which can exist in continuous amounts.

How was the Quantized Charge Problem first discovered?

The first evidence of the Quantized Charge Problem was found in the early 20th century by physicist Robert Millikan, who conducted the famous oil drop experiment. He observed that the charge on an oil droplet was always a multiple of the charge of an electron, providing strong evidence for quantized charge.

What is the explanation for the Quantized Charge Problem?

The explanation for this phenomenon lies in the fundamental nature of electric charge. According to quantum mechanics, charge is a property of subatomic particles, like electrons. These particles have a fixed, discrete amount of charge, and when they combine to form larger objects, their charges add up to give the quantized values we observe.

Are there any practical implications of the Quantized Charge Problem?

Yes, the Quantized Charge Problem has significant implications in modern technology, particularly in the field of electronics. It allows us to manipulate and control the flow of electric charge in precise and predictable ways, which is essential for the functioning of devices like computers and smartphones.

Similar threads

Back
Top