Quantum immortality and engineering your universe?

In summary: I think. It's more of a tool to explore the consequences of certain theories. But if in one of those two branches you are dead, then it wouldn't be much of a leap to think that your consciousness would go to the other one by necessity, meaning you would feel as though you escaped death when in reality you both lived and died.
  • #1
Meatbot
147
1
In the quantum suicide experiment, if many-worlds is true you'd end up miraculously surviving any suicide attempt. This forces you into an unlikely version of the universe, and each time you repeat it'd be more and more unlikely.

Ok...now would it not be true that the nature of your experiment can determine the likelihood of the universe in which you'd find yourself? Pointing a gun at your head and firing will produce a universe in which you survive because the gun may jam, or the bullet may miss a vital area. That's unlikely but not "extremely" unlikely.

But what if you change the method of suicide so that only a bizarre event can still keep you alive. What if you directed a 100 mile wide asteroid toward the Earth so it landed on your head? Any version in which you'd survive this would contain an extremely odd and unlikely scenario. Perhaps the only way you'd survive is if aliens intervened and made a protective shell around you. By doing this though, you are forcing yourself into an extremely unlikely and unusual version of the universe. Perhaps, if you are smart enough and with enough planning you could arrange a suicide method that produced a survival-scenario universe of your liking in which you were a billionaire, or in which aliens announced themselves, or whatever you liked. You could engineer the resulting universe by the nature of your suicide attempt. You could force extremely unlikely events to occur.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, fun isn't it :smile:

Only, it is a method which is only open to "true believers" :smile:
 
  • #3
Very entertaining account of reality. Thank you for that one, Meatbot. I bet you'll never run out of methods to kill yourself. Please keep experimenting and tell us about your results.
 
  • #4
OOO said:
Please keep experimenting and tell us about your results.

Meatbot probably ends up being left alive in a very bizarre world, but I'm afraid that we will hear him telling about them... "very unlikely".
 
  • #5
Sorry, didn't want to hurt you. It just appeared to me that something very unlikely has to be done for you to wake up. Do you realize what suicide is ? Did you care ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
OOO said:
Sorry, didn't want to hurt you. It just appeared to me that something very unlikely has to be done for you to wake up. Do you realize what suicide is ? Did you care ?
Quantum suicide is a thought-experiment about the consequences of the many-worlds interpretation, popularized by physicist Max Tegmark--see the lower section of this page. Personally I think the argument only works if you make some additional assumptions about philosophy of mind, but as philosophical assumptions go they're not so implausible (I would say the assumptions needed are similar to the ones made in the many-minds interpretation of QM, where each physical brain is associated with a large number of streams of consciousness, so that each time you have diverging versions of the same brain in the many-worlds interpretation, each stream has a certain chance of flowing into one version and a certain chance of flowing into the other)
 
  • #7
JesseM said:
Quantum suicide is a thought-experiment about the consequences of the many-worlds interpretation, popularized by physicist Max Tegmark

” The experiment essentially involves looking at the Schrödinger's cat experiment from the point of view of the cat.”

It is worth to add, perhaps, the first hand statement:” To cats usually addresses “thou”, although no single cat ever drank brotherhood with anybody.”

Regards, Dany.
 
  • #8
Anonym said:
” The experiment essentially involves looking at the Schrödinger's cat experiment from the point of view of the cat.”

Exactly...If many-worlds is right (and I think some form will end up being right), "you" (whatever that means) are constantly flipping into one branch or another as the universe splits. If there are two options at any given time, which do you experience? I don't know what happens if in both branches you are still alive. Perhaps someone has some insight.

But if in one of those two branches you are dead, then it wouldn't be much of a leap to think that your consciousness would go to the other one by necessity, meaning you would feel as though you escaped death when in reality you both lived and died.
 
  • #9
vanesch said:
Yes, fun isn't it :smile:

Only, it is a method which is only open to "true believers" :smile:

Except that you may get to find out when you are old enough to die of natural causes. You may begin to find it odd that you have been so lucky when you reach 200 years old and have miraculously survived several dangerous incidents.
 
  • #10
Meatbot said:
Exactly...If many-worlds is right (and I think some form will end up being right), "you" (whatever that means) are constantly flipping into one branch or another as the universe splits.
Like I said above, that's really closer to the many-minds interpretation. Many-worlds doesn't deal with questions about continuity of personal identity, what happens to "you" when branches split, or whether the word "you" has any real meaning in this context.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Meatbot said:
Except that you may get to find out when you are old enough to die of natural causes. You may begin to find it odd that you have been so lucky when you reach 200 years old and have miraculously survived several dangerous incidents.


to me quantum immortality is axiomatic- but impossible to prove or even experience- the only hint at such a process would be an observer personally experiencing several 'miraculous' survivals- however I have always argued that the Born probabilities of an event lethal to an observer has much much more probable outcomes involving more practical methods of survival- 'miraculous' really means 'less probable'- if you swallow the barrel of a high caliber gun [guaranteed to kill you- not merely maim] and it successfully fires- you should NOT experience a miracle were the bullet tunneled to Alpha Centauri- instead you should wake up in some future where your dead body was resuscitated and reconstructed- since waking up in a hospital in the future were new technology fixed you is always more likely than miracles-

this means that quantum immortality will always be an abstract idea without even the potential of basic circumstantial evidence- you will always experience survival and the reason for that survival will always be relatively rational and practical under the circumstances- the miracle outcomes are always very improbable- I think
 
Last edited:
  • #12
setAI said:
...you will always experience survival and the reason for that survival will always be relatively rational and practical under the circumstances- the miracle outcomes are always very improbable- I think

Yeah. Very good points. This is why I think it's quite likely that I will live to be well over 1,000 years old from my own point of view. In most universes you all will see me die at 100 or so, but I'll continue on living in those with advanced medicine and it'll seem perfectly rational to me since I'll see everyone else living that long as well. I will be kept alive by advanced medicine.
 
  • #13
Meatbot said:
Except that you may get to find out when you are old enough to die of natural causes. You may begin to find it odd that you have been so lucky when you reach 200 years old and have miraculously survived several dangerous incidents.

True. I think that at the age of 400, I will try to use the "improbability drive". By then, I might be convinced, if not totally senile :smile: First of all, I'll get rich through the lottery. That's easy: use some quantum device to fill out your lottery form, and then write a simple computer program that will read out the result of the drawing. If you are not the winner, blow up an explosive belt that you are wearing. If for one or other reason it fails (improbability drive...) try again.
 
  • #14
vanesch said:
True. I think that at the age of 400, I will try to use the "improbability drive". By then, I might be convinced, if not totally senile :smile: First of all, I'll get rich through the lottery. That's easy: use some quantum device to fill out your lottery form, and then write a simple computer program that will read out the result of the drawing. If you are not the winner, blow up an explosive belt that you are wearing. If for one or other reason it fails (improbability drive...) try again.

The problem with that though is that the quantum devices by their nature are far more likely to fail than your chances of winning the lottery are, There would be an arrangent of atoms that would cause the device to not work, or another arrangement that would mean you survive but terribly maimed.

I DO think that the idea would stand more chances of working the lower the lottery win you were aiming for. So if you are playing a lottery with shorter odds and lower prizes it would work. All you have to do is play it time and time again to accumulate cash.

It is interesting that from my own life viewpoint I do indeed seem to find myself in a universe where methods of prolonging life might reasonably be available within my lifetime through medicicinal advantages.
 
  • #15
Meatbot said:
Exactly...If many-worlds is right (and I think some form will end up being right), "you" (whatever that means) are constantly flipping into one branch or another as the universe splits.

Correction: not "one or another" but into BOTH.
 
  • #16
I believe it is more likely (or probable) that you end up "finding" yourself in a universe where you changed your mind the last minute and didn't commit the suicide than in a universe of infinitesimal probability where your suicide attempt failed.

Just my two cents. "Immortality" just sounds so... unreal.
 
  • #17
Dmitry67 said:
Correction: not "one or another" but into BOTH.

If one person becomes multiple people, then the referring to "you" loses all meaning. I am my state now as well as all the states that led up to this moment. The branches my past self became that is not the me typing to you is not me. I have become the state that is now typing to you, while another me that arose from past me is not. A meta self exist as all of these states, but "you" are unaware of this because realization of your state is a function of your state and the states prior (memories).
 
  • #18
it would seem to me that ending up as a quadriplegic with severe brain damage constantly needing blood transfusions would be more likely then a full recovery for all of these "suicides", therefore that is what will happen to the "experimenter".
 

FAQ: Quantum immortality and engineering your universe?

What is quantum immortality?

Quantum immortality is a theory that suggests that our consciousness or soul continues to exist in parallel universes even after our physical death. This is based on the idea that every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a different universe, and therefore, our consciousness will always continue to exist in one of these universes.

How is quantum immortality related to engineering our universe?

The concept of quantum immortality is closely related to the idea of engineering our universe. This is because the theory of quantum immortality suggests that we have the ability to manipulate reality and create our own desired outcomes by making specific choices in our lives. By engineering our universe, we can create the reality we want to experience.

Is quantum immortality a scientifically proven concept?

No, quantum immortality is currently just a theory and has not been scientifically proven. It is a philosophical and metaphysical concept that is still being explored and debated by scientists and philosophers.

How can we engineer our universe using quantum immortality?

The idea of engineering our universe using quantum immortality is based on the concept of the multiverse, where every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a different universe. By consciously making choices and decisions, we can shift our consciousness into a different universe where our desired outcome has become a reality.

What are the implications of quantum immortality for our understanding of reality?

Quantum immortality challenges our traditional understanding of reality and raises questions about the nature of consciousness and the universe. It suggests that there could be an infinite number of parallel universes and that our consciousness may exist beyond the physical realm. This concept opens up a whole new realm of possibilities and raises philosophical and ethical implications that are still being explored.

Similar threads

Back
Top