Quantum mechanics, harmonic oscillator

In summary, The probability to find the particle between x and x+dx is given by P(x)dx=-\frac{T}{2\pi} \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \right ) dx.
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,950
264

Homework Statement


Consider a classical particle in an unidimensional harmonic potential. Let A be the amplitude of the oscillation of the particle at a given energy. Show that the probability to find the particule between [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]x+dx[/itex] is given by [itex]P(x)dx=\frac{dx}{\pi \sqrt {A^2-x^2}}[/itex].
1)Graph P(x) and compare it with the probability to find a quantum particle between x and dx for the first state of the unidimensional harmonic quantum oscillator.
2)What is the probability to find the classical and quantum particles in some position between 0 and A/2?
3)Graph the density of probability for the state n=10 of the harmonic quantum oscillator and compare it with the classical density of probability of the particle for this same energy.

Homework Equations


Details in next section.
[itex]T=\frac{2 \pi}{\omega}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution


So my strategy to show the mathematical relation of P(x) is to write find what percentage of its time the particle passes from x to dx compared to half its period (the particle "runs" a distance of A in that time).
So I start with [itex]x(t)=A\cos (\omega t)[/itex]. I want to get dt in function of dx. So I find t in function of x first. This gives me [itex]t= \left [ \arccos \left ( \frac{x}{A} \right ) \right ] \frac{1}{\omega}[/itex].
Now I take the differential [itex]d/dx[/itex] in both sides of this equation:
[itex]\frac{dt}{dx}= \left ( \frac{1}{\omega} \right ) \frac{d}{dx}\left [ \arccos \left ( \frac{x}{A} \right ) \right ]=-\frac{1}{\omega} \left [ \frac{1}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \right ]=-\frac{1}{\omega} \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \right )=-\frac{T}{2\pi} \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}}\right ) \Rightarrow dt =- \frac{T}{2 \pi} \left ( \frac{1}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \right ) dx[/itex].
But I know that if [itex]t_1-t_0=T/2[/itex], [itex]x_0=0[/itex] and [itex]x_1=A[/itex] can be associated to [itex]t_0[/itex] and [itex]t_1[/itex] respectively. So that I can write [itex]\frac{T}{2}=-\frac{T}{2\pi} \int _0 ^A \frac{dx}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \Rightarrow 1=-\frac{1}{\pi} \cdot \frac{\pi}{2}=-\frac{1}{2}[/itex] which is obvisouly wrong.
I don't where I went wrong. I hope someone can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
fluidistic said:
.
But I know that if [itex]t_1-t_0=T/2[/itex], [itex]x_0=0[/itex] and [itex]x_1=A[/itex] can be associated to [itex]t_0[/itex] and [itex]t_1[/itex] respectively. So that I can write [itex]\frac{T}{2}=-\frac{T}{2\pi} \int _0 ^A \frac{dx}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}}[/itex]

You set t0=0 and t1=T/2. What is cos(wt) at t=0 and and at t=T/2?

ehild
 
  • #3
ehild said:
You set t0=0 and t1=T/2. What is cos(wt) at t=0 and and at t=T/2?

ehild

Oh nice... Now I see my error. I get 1 for both. So rather than t=T/2 I must pick t=T/4.
Now I reach 1=-1 though.
[itex]T/4=-\frac{T}{2\pi} \int _0 ^A \frac{dx}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}} \Rightarrow 1=-1[/itex].

Edit: Probably I should inverse the limits of integration... but still I don't really understand why it's not the same.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I'm somehow at a loss.
I know that in a time t=T/4, the particle runs a distance A.
In a time t=dt the particle runs a distance in terms of an [arctan (fraction involving a square root ) ] and differential x. I'm not sure about this though.
I've been 2 more hours on this problem, trying to reach the result but I don't get it.
I tried dt/(T/4) to get the probability for the particle to be between x and x+dx but this didn't work well. My answer differs from a factor of -1/2 from the answer if I do this.
I tried other stuff but senless I think. I'm lost.
 
  • #5
You integrated the time from t=0 to t=T/2.
At t=0, x = Acos(w*0)=A, as cos(0)=1
At t=T/2, x==Acos(w*T/2) Acos(pi)=-A, as cos(pi)=-1.
You have to integrate from x=A to x=-A.

By the way, you can choose x=Asin(wt) and then you do not have problems with the minuses.

ehild
 
  • #6
ehild said:
You integrated the time from t=0 to t=T/2.
At t=0, x = Acos(w*0)=A, as cos(0)=1
At t=T/2, x==Acos(w*T/2) Acos(pi)=-A, as cos(pi)=-1.
You have to integrate from x=A to x=-A.

By the way, you can choose x=Asin(wt) and then you do not have problems with the minuses.

ehild

Yes I realized this. What I did is integrating dt from 0 to T/4 and the expression with dx from A to 0. Now I get 1=1 as it should.
But I'm totally lost after this.
I thought that the probability would be given by [itex]dt/(T/4)=\frac{4dt}{T}=-\frac{2}{\pi} \frac{dx}{\sqrt {A^2-x^2}}[/itex], which is as I said in my previous post, different from the answer by a factor -1/2.
 
  • #7
The probability of finding the particle between x and x+dx is the length of the time interval during the particle is in the desired x interval, divided by the time period. Draw a cosine curve from t=0 to T. How long is the particle between x and x+dx? Is it only one interval? Do the relative signs of dx and dt count?

ehild
 
  • #8
ehild said:
The probability of finding the particle between x and x+dx is the length of the time interval during the particle is in the desired x interval, divided by the time period. Draw a cosine curve from t=0 to T. How long is the particle between x and x+dx? Is it only one interval? Do the relative signs of dx and dt count?

ehild

Oh thank you, that's right.
I drew the sketch and the particle passes twice at every position (but one), the sign doesn't matter and I reach the desired result.
Now trying to solve 1, 2 and 3.
For the quantum oscillator, I think that [itex]\Psi (x)=(km)^{1/8} \hbar ^{-1/4}\pi ^{-1/2} e^{-\frac{(km)^{1/2}}{2\hbar}x^2}[/itex]. I reached this by solving part 1) of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=442195. (that was 1 year ago but I redid all the algebra now).
So that [itex]\int _{x}^{x+dx}|\Psi (x)|^2dx= (km)^{1/4}\hbar ^{-1/2} \pi ^{-1} e^{-\frac{\sqrt {km}}{\hbar }x^2}dx[/itex].
What I expect to see in the graphs is that P(x) will probably be slightly bigger on the edges of the potential for the quantum oscillator compared to the classical one.
I'll try to see this on a graph but I'm not even 100% sure what I expect is right.


Edit: I attach the graph of both functions for arbritrary constants. I had to play for several minutes with the coefficients to get such a graph. I am quite surprised especially for the quantum oscillator graph (blueish line). The reddish line is the classical oscillador.
 

Attachments

  • QMvsCM.pdf
    40.6 KB · Views: 230
Last edited:
  • #9
fluidistic said:
For the quantum oscillator, I think that [itex]\Psi (x)=(km)^{1/8} \hbar ^{-1/4}\pi ^{-1/2} e^{-\frac{(km)^{1/2}}{2\hbar}x^2}[/itex].

Are you sure? It is so easy to Google it... Does the first state mean n=0 or n=1?

You need to compare the same oscillators with the same energy. Choose the constants accordingly. Write the probabilities in terms of ω, and choose the amplitude of the classical oscillator so its energy is [itex]\frac{ωh}{2\pi }(n+1/2)[/itex].


ehild
 
  • #10
ehild said:
Are you sure? It is so easy to Google it... Does the first state mean n=0 or n=1?

You need to compare the same oscillators with the same energy. Choose the constants accordingly. Write the probabilities in terms of ω, and choose the amplitude of the classical oscillator so its energy is [itex]\frac{ωh}{2\pi }(n+1/2)[/itex].ehild
Ok I've progressed on this subject. First state means n=0.
For the quantum oscillator, I know that [itex]E= \left ( n+\frac{1}{2} \right ) \hbar \omega[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • #11
And what is the energy of the classical oscillator?
n=0 means no real oscillation. Te particle is nearly at its equilibrium position. If you choose a classical particle with mass much larger than that of an atom, it is confined in a very small interval around x=0.

ehild
 

FAQ: Quantum mechanics, harmonic oscillator

What is quantum mechanics?

Quantum mechanics is a branch of physics that deals with the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level. It explains the fundamental principles that govern the behavior of matter and energy at these tiny scales.

What is a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics?

A harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics refers to a system that exhibits periodic motion and is described by the harmonic oscillator potential. This potential is used to describe the behavior of particles in a variety of physical systems, such as atoms, molecules, and even subatomic particles.

How is a harmonic oscillator different from a classical oscillator?

The main difference between a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics and a classical oscillator is that in quantum mechanics, the energy of the oscillator is quantized, meaning it can only take on certain discrete values. In classical mechanics, the energy is continuous and can take on any value. Additionally, in quantum mechanics, the position and momentum of the oscillator are described by wave functions, rather than definite values as in classical mechanics.

What is the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics?

The uncertainty principle is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states that it is impossible to know both the exact position and momentum of a particle simultaneously. This means that there will always be some degree of uncertainty in our measurements of these quantities. The uncertainty principle is a result of the wave-particle duality of matter in quantum mechanics.

What are some practical applications of quantum mechanics and harmonic oscillators?

Quantum mechanics and harmonic oscillators have many practical applications, including in the development of new technologies such as transistors, lasers, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines. They are also used in fields such as chemistry, materials science, and engineering to understand and manipulate the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic level.

Back
Top