Quantum Mechanics: Questions on Stationary Particles & Wave Function

  • Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Qm
In summary, the conversation is about the concept of a stationary particle in quantum mechanics and its association with a wavefunction. The person involved has three queries to clarify, including the possibility of a stationary particle in QM and the role of a wavefunction in this scenario. The conversation also delves into the expression for momentum in terms of the Fourier transform of the wavefunction and the placement of Ψ* in the formula. The expert summarizer explains that while a stationary wavefunction is possible in QM, a particle strictly at rest is not possible. The expert also advises the person to continue their QM course to gain a better understanding of these concepts.
  • #1
neelakash
511
1
I have started my course (a bit earlier than my university---that is why I am reading myself) in Quantum Physics.And I got the following queries to clarify:
Sometimes we need to accept seemingly contradictory features...I want to discuss them and clarify...

(i)Can we conceive a stationary (at rest) particle in QM?If so,do we need to associate a wave-function with it?

What I think:Qm is not worried about this.Even if it is possible,there will be no physically interesting situation...

(ii)In the expression of a(p),which is the Fourier transform of Ψ(x),time t is explicit.Yet, a(p) does not depend on time.

What I think:I do not understand why.

(iii) We know: <x>=∫(Ψ* x Ψ) dx and <p>=(ˉh/i) ∫[Ψ* (∂/∂x) Ψ] dx
where (h/2π)= ˉh


Why is Ψ* in the front place and not the Ψ?What would be the problem if the formula were:

<x>=∫(Ψ x Ψ*) dx and <p>=(ˉh/i) ∫[Ψ (∂/∂x) Ψ*] dx

What I think: I do not understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
neelakash said:
(i)Can we conceive a stationary (at rest) particle in QM?If so,do we need to associate a wave-function with it?

What I think:Qm is not worried about this.Even if it is possible,there will be no physically interesting situation...

Stationary, and at rest, do not mean the same in QM.

A wavefunction is stationary in QM if its probability density does not change with time. This is the case for all the eigenstates of a hamiltonian.

Classically, a particle at rest will have a definite position and a definite momentum (p=0), in a given
instant of time. This is not possible in quantum mechanics. And, as quantum mechanics is (so far)
succesful in describing nature, there are no particles strictly at rest in nature.

If you define "at rest", as something having zero momentum, one can have such a particle in QM, and it will be described by a wavefunction, given by a constant Ψ(x)=C, which will have zero momentum, but the position will be completely undetermined.


Have fun with quantum mechanics. Your other questions will be clear once that you follow your QM course.
 

FAQ: Quantum Mechanics: Questions on Stationary Particles & Wave Function

What is a stationary particle in quantum mechanics?

A stationary particle in quantum mechanics refers to a particle that is not moving and does not have any kinetic energy. It is described by a wave function that does not change over time.

What is the wave function in quantum mechanics?

The wave function in quantum mechanics is a mathematical representation of the state of a particle or system. It describes the probability of finding a particle in a particular position and momentum.

What is the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics?

The uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics states that it is impossible to simultaneously know the exact position and momentum of a particle. The more precisely one quantity is known, the less precisely the other can be known.

What is the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics?

The Schrödinger equation is the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics. It describes how the wave function of a particle evolves over time in a given potential energy field.

How does quantum mechanics explain the behavior of particles?

Quantum mechanics explains the behavior of particles by incorporating the concept of wave-particle duality, where particles can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like properties. It also takes into account the probabilistic nature of particles and their interactions with potential energy fields.

Back
Top