I Quantum mechanics stationary state

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Hi,
I have hard time to really understand what's a stationary state for a wave function.
I know in a stationary state all observables are independent of time, but is the energy fix?
Is the particle has some momentum?
If a wave function oscillates between multiple energies does it means that the wave function is a sum of stationary states and then it is not a stationary state?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a Hamiltonian that does not explicitly depend on time, the stationary states are the energy eigenstates. Let ##u_E(\vec{x})## be a solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (i.e., the eigenvalue equation for the Hamiltonian),
$$\hat{H}u_E=E u_E,$$
and take this as initial state for your wave function, you get
$$\psi(t,\vec{x})=\exp(-\mathrm{i} \hat{H} t/\hbar) u_E(\vec{x})=u_E(\vec{x}) \exp(-\mathrm{i} E t/\hbar),$$
which means that ##\psi## is always ##u_E## multiplied by a phase factor, i.e., the state always stays the one described by ##u_E(\vec{x})## and thus is stationary. Indeed the probability distribution for finding the particle at position ##\vec{x}## is
$$P(t,\vec{x})=|\psi(t,\vec{x})|^2=|u_E(\vec{x})|^2,$$
which is time-independent.

In general the particle in an energy eigenstate does not have a determined momentum. That's only possible, if the momentum operators ##\hat{\vec{p}}=-\mathrm{i} \hbar \vec{\nabla}## commute with the Hamiltonian, i.e., if the Hamiltonian doesn't depend on the position operators ##\hat{\vec{x}}##. That's fulfilled for the free-particle Hamiltonian,
$$\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2m} \hat{\vec{p}}^2.$$
In this case a complete set of compatible observables are the three momentum components, and the corresponding eigenfunctions,
$$u_{\vec{p}}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}} \exp(\mathrm{i} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}/\hbar),$$
form a complete set of energy eigenfunctions. The energy eigenvalues are given by
$$\hat{H} u_{\vec{p}}(\vec{x})=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \Delta u_{\vec{p}}(\vec{x})=\frac{1}{2m} \vec{p}^2 u_{\vec{p}}(\vec{x}), \quad E=\frac{1}{2m} \vec{p}^2.$$
A wave function doesn't oscillate between energy values. The value of the wave function is a probability amplitude, i.e., ##|\psi(t,\vec{x})|^2## is the probability distribution for finding the particle at position ##\vec{x}## when measured at time ##t##.

A general wave function is a superposition of energy eigenfunctions.
$$\psi(t,\vec{x})=\sum_E \exp(-\mathrm{i} E t/\hbar) c_E u_E(t,\vec{x}),$$
where the ##c_E## are coefficients determined by the initial state, ##\psi(t=0,\vec{x})=\psi_0(\vec{x})##,
$$c_E =\langle u_E|\psi_0 \rangle=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x u_E^*(\vec{x}) \psi_0(\vec{x}),$$
where for simplicity I assumed that the energy eigenvalues are non-degenerate.
 
  • Like
Likes happyparticle, BvU, topsquark and 1 other person
happyparticle said:
If a wave function oscillates between multiple energies does it means that the wave function is a sum of stationary states and then it is not a stationary state?
A linear combination (superposition) of stationary states is not a stationary state. This is fundamental to QM.

Mathematically, a linear combination of eigenvectors of an operator (with different eigenvalues) is not an eigenvector of that operator.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top