Quantum mechanics, wavefunction problem

In summary, the homework equation states that C^2 \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} |\Psi (x,t)|^2 dx=1. I integrate the two lower case psi functions and find that c_1=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi _1 ^* (x)\Psi (x,0)dx and c_2=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi _2 (x)\Psi (x,0)dx. When I use the complex conjugate of the first function in the integrand, I get c_i=\int \ps
  • #1
fluidistic
Gold Member
3,949
264

Homework Statement


Consider the wavefunction [itex]\Psi (x,t)=c_1 \psi _1 (x)e^{-\frac{iE_1t}{\hbar}}+c_2 \psi _2 (x)e^{-\frac{iE_2t}{\hbar}}[/itex] where [itex]\psi _1 (x)[/itex] and [itex]\psi _2 (x)[/itex] are normalized and orthogonal. Knowing [itex]\Psi (x,0)[/itex], find the values of [itex]c_1[/itex] and [itex]c_2[/itex].


Homework Equations



[itex]C^2 \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} |\Psi (x,t)|^2 dx=1[/itex]. I also know that the product of psi 1 by psi 2 is worth 0 (they are orthogonal) so this simplifies the expression to integrate.
But I'm still left with the integration of both lower case psi functions that I don't know how to handle.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking on how to use the fact that I know Psi at t=0 but so far I'm out of ideas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[itex]\psi _i (x)[/itex]-s are orthonormal, what does it mean on the integrals of [itex]\psi _i ^* (x) \psi _j (x)[/itex]?

ehild
 
  • #3
ehild said:
[itex]\psi _i (x)[/itex]-s are orthonormal, what does it mean on the integrals of [itex]\psi _i ^* (x) \psi _j (x)[/itex]?

ehild

Sorry for being almost 1 month late. That they are worth 1?

Edit: Is what I've done right?:
[itex]\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi _1 (x) \Psi (x,0)dx=c_1 \int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi _1 ^2 (x)dx=c_1[/itex].
In the same fashion I get [itex]c_2=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \Psi _2 (x) \Psi (x,0)dx[/itex].
But I didn't use any complex conjugate... I must be missing something.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
That's almost correct. It should be
[tex]c_i = \int \psi_i^*(x)\Psi(x,0)\,dx[/tex]When you calculate the inner product, you use the complex conjugate of the first function in the integrand.
 
  • #5
vela said:
That's almost correct. It should be
[tex]c_i = \int \psi_i^*(x)\Psi(x,0)\,dx[/tex]When you calculate the inner product, you use the complex conjugate of the first function in the integrand.

Let's see if I understand:
[itex]\int _{- \infty}^{\infty} \Psi _1 ^* (x) \Psi (x,0)dx=c_1 \int _{- \infty}^{\infty} \Psi _1 ^* (x) \Psi _1 (x)dx=c_1 \int _{-\infty} ^{\infty} |\Psi _1 (x)|^2 dx=c_1[/itex].
Am I right if I say that since [itex]\Psi _1(x)[/itex] and [itex]\Psi _2 (x)[/itex] are orthogonal, so is [itex]\Psi _1^* (x)[/itex] with [itex]\Psi _2 (x)[/itex]? Because I'm using this fact!
Thanks for your help guys.
 
  • #6
Yup. When you say the two are orthogonal, you mean that
[tex]\int \psi_1^*(x)\psi_2(x)\,dx = 0.[/tex]It does not mean that
[tex]\int \psi_1(x)\psi_2(x)\,dx = 0.[/tex]The complex conjugation is a vital part of taking the inner product.
 
  • #7
vela said:
Yup. When you say the two are orthogonal, you mean that
[tex]\int \psi_1^*(x)\psi_2(x)\,dx = 0.[/tex]It does not mean that
[tex]\int \psi_1(x)\psi_2(x)\,dx = 0.[/tex]The complex conjugation is a vital part of taking the inner product.
Oh, I understand. Wow, thank so you much. My understanding was so poor before I asked help for this problem... now things are getting clearer.
 

FAQ: Quantum mechanics, wavefunction problem

What is the wavefunction problem in quantum mechanics?

The wavefunction problem is a fundamental issue in quantum mechanics that refers to the inability to predict the exact position and momentum of a quantum particle at any given time. This is due to the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, which states that the wavefunction of a particle only describes the probability of finding the particle in a certain location or with a certain momentum, rather than its exact position or momentum.

How is the wavefunction problem related to the uncertainty principle?

The wavefunction problem is closely related to the uncertainty principle, which states that the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less we can know about its momentum, and vice versa. This is because the wavefunction of a particle contains information about both its position and momentum, but the more we know about one, the less we know about the other.

3. What is the role of the observer in the wavefunction problem?

The role of the observer is crucial in the wavefunction problem. According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the act of measurement by an observer causes the wavefunction to collapse, resulting in a definite position and momentum for the particle. This is known as the measurement problem, and it is still a subject of debate among scientists.

4. Can the wavefunction problem be solved?

At this point, the wavefunction problem cannot be completely solved. However, there are various interpretations and approaches to quantum mechanics that attempt to address this issue. These include the Copenhagen interpretation, the many-worlds interpretation, and the pilot-wave theory. Each of these interpretations has its own implications and limitations.

5. What are the practical applications of quantum mechanics and the wavefunction problem?

Quantum mechanics has a wide range of applications in modern technology, such as in the development of computer chips, lasers, and medical imaging devices. However, the wavefunction problem and the uncertainty principle also have implications in fields such as cryptography and quantum computing, where the probabilistic nature of quantum particles can be harnessed for secure communication and advanced computing capabilities.

Back
Top