Quantum Numbers: Why (3,-2,0,1/2) is Invalid

Therefore, (3, -2, 0, 1/2) is not a valid quantum number. In summary, the values for n, l, ml, and ms must follow certain rules and restrictions, and in this case, l cannot be negative.
  • #1
Feodalherren
605
6

Homework Statement


Why isn't (3, -2 , 0 , 1/2) a valid quantum number?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


n=3

so l = -2 is valid.

-l≤Ml≤l

2≤Ml≤-2
nonsensical statement. I don't know what to do...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Feodalherren said:

Homework Statement


Why isn't (3, -2 , 0 , 1/2) a valid quantum number?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


n=3

so l = -2 is valid.

-l≤Ml≤l

2≤Ml≤-2
nonsensical statement. I don't know what to do...

No, l=-2 is not valid. l is always non-negative.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
Ah so it's that simple... Thanks.
 
  • #4
I agree.
n = 3
l = 0, 1, 2
ml = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2
ms = -1/2 or 1/2

l cannot be negative, but ml can be.
 
  • #5


The set of quantum numbers (n, l, ml, ms) is used to describe the energy levels, subshells, orbital orientations, and spin states of an electron in an atom. Each quantum number has a specific range of values that it can take on, and (3, -2, 0, 1/2) does not fall within these ranges.

The first quantum number, n, represents the principal energy level and can only take on positive integer values (1, 2, 3, etc.). Therefore, n=3 is a valid value.

The second quantum number, l, represents the angular momentum quantum number and is related to the shape of the orbital. It can only take on values from 0 to n-1. In this case, n=3, so l can only be 0, 1, or 2. -2 is not a valid value for l.

The third quantum number, ml, represents the magnetic quantum number and describes the orientation of the orbital in space. It can take on values from -l to l. In this case, l=-2, so ml can only be -2, -1, 0, 1, or 2. 0 is a valid value for ml.

The fourth quantum number, ms, represents the spin quantum number and describes the spin of the electron. It can only take on two values, +1/2 or -1/2. 1/2 is a valid value for ms.

Therefore, the quantum number set (3, -2, 0, 1/2) is invalid because -2 is not a valid value for l. The correct set of quantum numbers for an electron in the third energy level would be (3, 0, 0, 1/2).
 

FAQ: Quantum Numbers: Why (3,-2,0,1/2) is Invalid

What are quantum numbers?

Quantum numbers are a set of four values used to describe the energy state and spatial orientation of an electron in an atom.

Why is the quantum number (3,-2,0,1/2) considered invalid?

This combination of quantum numbers violates the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons in the same atom can have the same set of quantum numbers. The third number, known as the magnetic quantum number, cannot have a value of -2 as it can only range from -l to l, where l is the orbital angular momentum quantum number, which in this case is 3. Therefore, the combination is invalid.

Can quantum numbers (3,-2,0,1/2) be used to describe any electron in an atom?

No, each electron in an atom must have a unique set of quantum numbers. This means that while (3,-2,0,1/2) may be valid for one electron, it cannot be used to describe another electron in the same atom.

How do quantum numbers relate to the energy levels of an atom?

The first three quantum numbers (n, l, and ml) determine the energy level, or shell, of the electron. The fourth quantum number (ms) determines the orientation of the electron within that energy level.

Can quantum numbers be used to predict the exact location of an electron in an atom?

No, quantum numbers only describe the probability distribution of where an electron may be located in an atom. The exact location of an electron cannot be known due to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top