- #1
CDL
- 20
- 1
I am reading Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, specifically the chapter on scattering. He is discussing the scenario where an incoming beam of particles scatter off an azimuthally symmetric target.
At large separation ##r## from the scattering centre, the wavefunction for incoming particles is $$\psi(r, \theta) \approx A \left[e^{ikz} + f(\theta) \frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\right] = \psi_\text{incident} + \psi_\text{scattered}$$ He says,
"The probability that the incident particle, traveling at speed v, passes through the infinitesimal area ##d \sigma##, in time ##dt## is equal to the probability that the particle scatters into the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##."
He equates ##dP =|\psi_{\text{incident}}|^2 dV = |A|^2 (v dt) d\sigma## to ##dP = |\psi_{\text{scattered}}|^2 dV = \frac{|A|^2 |f|^2}{r^2} (vdt) r^2 d \Omega##
This is used to derive the relation ##\frac{d \sigma}{ d \Omega} = | f (\theta) | ^2##.
Is this the quantum analog of the classical scenario, where when a particle passes through an area ##d \sigma## it is guaranteed to pass through the solid angle ##d \Omega##? Why should this be true? I can't wrap my head around why this claim would be made. What happens, say if we know that a particle passed through an area ##d \sigma##. Would that affect the probability of it passing through the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##? To me it seems like the claim is plausible, but a more in depth and hopefully intuitive explanation would be appreciated.
At large separation ##r## from the scattering centre, the wavefunction for incoming particles is $$\psi(r, \theta) \approx A \left[e^{ikz} + f(\theta) \frac{e^{ikr}}{r}\right] = \psi_\text{incident} + \psi_\text{scattered}$$ He says,
"The probability that the incident particle, traveling at speed v, passes through the infinitesimal area ##d \sigma##, in time ##dt## is equal to the probability that the particle scatters into the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##."
He equates ##dP =|\psi_{\text{incident}}|^2 dV = |A|^2 (v dt) d\sigma## to ##dP = |\psi_{\text{scattered}}|^2 dV = \frac{|A|^2 |f|^2}{r^2} (vdt) r^2 d \Omega##
This is used to derive the relation ##\frac{d \sigma}{ d \Omega} = | f (\theta) | ^2##.
Is this the quantum analog of the classical scenario, where when a particle passes through an area ##d \sigma## it is guaranteed to pass through the solid angle ##d \Omega##? Why should this be true? I can't wrap my head around why this claim would be made. What happens, say if we know that a particle passed through an area ##d \sigma##. Would that affect the probability of it passing through the corresponding solid angle ##d \Omega##? To me it seems like the claim is plausible, but a more in depth and hopefully intuitive explanation would be appreciated.