Quck question about graphing a parametric equation

In summary: Note that we cannot express a general point (x,y) using a single function. There are many possible functions f(t) that map to (x,y).The parametrization is often used when the path of the point is important. For example, imagine a point on a bicycle wheel. We can describe the position of the point as a function of the angle of the wheel. f(t) = ( rcos(t) , rsin(t) ) is the path of the point as the wheel turns. We could just as well have said f(x) = ( x , \sqrt{ r^{2} - x^{2} } ) is the path of the point as the wheel turns.
  • #1
DMOC
100
0

Homework Statement




Graph the parametric equation.

t is greater than or equal to zero and t is less than or equal to 2 pi.

x=sint
y=cost

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming that I don't have a calculator, how would I graph this?

I know that there's a point which x=0, y=1, and t=0.

x=sint
0=sint
t=0

And also, the equation of the line without using trig functions is y=1-2x^2 so putting in x as 0 means y=1.

Is there any way I can find out the other points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi DMOC! :smile:

(have a π and a ≤ and a ≥ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
DMOC said:
And also, the equation of the line without using trig functions is y=1-2x^2

erm :redface: … noooo
x=sint
y=cost

What is the relationship between sint and cost? :smile:
 
  • #3
DMOC said:
Assuming that I don't have a calculator, how would I graph this?
Pick a few, well-chosen values for t (like 0, pi/6, pi/4, pi/3, pi/2, etc.), calculate the values for x and y, and graph the x-y pairs.
 
  • #4
You don't have a calculator but you can still pick certain standard values for t.

Try t = 0, π/6 (30°), π/4 (45°), π/3 (60°), π/2 (90°) and so on...
Figuring out your trig values should also lead you to ... "Oh but of course!" with regard to your original problem.

If you haven't learned standard trig values at least go back and look up the definition of sine and cosine. (And you ought to go back and learn the standard trig values too.)

In fact here is a quick way to memorize them:
[tex][\sqrt{0}/2, \sqrt{1}/2, \sqrt{2}/2, \sqrt{3}/2, \sqrt{4}/2 ][/tex]
or
[tex][0,1/2, \sqrt{2}/2, \sqrt{3}/2,1][/tex]
are the values of sin(θ) for θ = 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. The cosines are the same but in reverse order. To get the rest you still need to review the basic definition of the trig functions for arbitrary angles.
 
  • #5
Thanks for the help everyone.

All right, let me try to write the equation of the line again.

By the way, if this matters. .. I made an error in my original post.

The correct equations are:

x = sin t same as before

y = cos (2t) Needed a 2 to add with the cos.

Here's how I did this:

Cos 2 theta trig identity.

[tex]Cos(2\theta) = 1- 2sin^{2}\theta[/tex]

If x = sint, then x2 = sin2t

Now just let t = theta.

[tex]y = 1 - 2x^{2}[/tex]

Sorry about that error in the original post.

Is this line equation correct?

I'm going to start testing out trig values now.
 
  • #6
Looks good, but it's not a line. Your parametric curve is a parabola.
 
  • #7
So if t = pi/6, then x must be 1/2.

I think I'll make that a point on my graph. The question is, where will I put it, since it's an x-y coordinate system?
 
  • #8
DMOC said:
So if t = pi/6, then x must be 1/2.

I think I'll make that a point on my graph. The question is, where will I put it, since it's an x-y coordinate system?

You got x from x=sin(t) = sin(pi/6)
You just said y = cos(2t) so ...

Just plot (sin(t), cos(2t) ) for various values. Especially include the end points. Then you can look at the algebraic relationship between x and y via trig identities and see how to fill in the gaps. Remember that the trig functions are bounded between +/- 1 so your shape must be within the square with corners at (+/- 1, +/- 1).

BTW My comments about "Oh! but of course" reflected your mispost. Obviously x=sin(t) y = cos(t) gives the unit circle centered at the origin. This (with x and y swapped) is the definition of circle trig.
 
  • #9
Yeah, sorry about my screw - up. :(

Ok, thanks for your advice. I think I've got this problem in the bag.

Last question: When I plot coordinates on the x-y graph with a parametric equation, do I write out the points like this: (x , y) or (x, y, t)?
 
  • #10
(x, y) but you could put a side note indicating the value of t for some of the points. On a two-dimension graph, you really have only two coordinates.
 
  • #11
Ok thanks.
 
  • #12
DMOC said:
Yeah, sorry about my screw - up. :(

Ok, thanks for your advice. I think I've got this problem in the bag.

Last question: When I plot coordinates on the x-y graph with a parametric equation, do I write out the points like this: (x , y) or (x, y, t)?

(x,y) or if you want to express the t dependence ( x(t) , y(t) )
x and y functions of t.

Remember functions can be defined mapping any type of object to any type of object, not just numbers to numbers. In this case the parametrization is a function mapping real numbers (the parameter) to points. We express this single function P(t) by giving the functions for the coordinates in a given coordinate system: P(t) = ( x(t) , y(t) ).
 

FAQ: Quck question about graphing a parametric equation

What is a parametric equation?

A parametric equation is a set of equations that express the coordinates of a point in terms of one or more independent variables, known as parameters.

How do you graph a parametric equation?

To graph a parametric equation, first choose a range of values for the parameter(s). Then, plug in these values to the equations to get corresponding x and y coordinates. Plot these points on a graph and connect them to create a curve.

What are the advantages of using parametric equations for graphing?

One advantage is that parametric equations can represent more complex curves than traditional equations. They also allow for easier manipulation and adjustments of the curve by changing the parameters.

Can a parametric equation have more than two parameters?

Yes, a parametric equation can have any number of parameters. However, for graphing purposes, it is common to have two parameters since we are typically graphing in two dimensions.

Are there any limitations to graphing with parametric equations?

One limitation is that it can be challenging to interpret the graph without knowing the corresponding parameter values. Additionally, some curves may be difficult to represent accurately with parametric equations.

Back
Top