Question about a number of Physics ideas

In summary, the conversation mainly revolves around a discussion about using scientific concepts in a sci-fi story. The writer asks for guidance on where to ask questions about scientific explanations and if it is appropriate to do so in the forum. They also share their idea of using magnetic fields to manipulate space for interstellar travel and ask for feedback on its feasibility. The conversation also touches on topics such as shooting sub-atomic particles through atoms and using mass spectrometers to identify components of a substance. Some members suggest that these ideas may be more suited for science fiction rather than being scientifically accurate.
  • #1
Darth Bandon
Hi,

I'm sorry if this question is in the wrong topic, but I am currently writing sci-fi story which contains a lot of scientific explanations. I would like, if possible to run some of the ideas past some people who know something on the subject. Can somone please tell me where i can ask these questions and if it's ok to ask these questions in this forum?

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
u can do it here make it as a topic and we all can discuss this ideas
 
  • #3
Darth Bandon said:
Hi,

I'm sorry if this question is in the wrong topic, but I am currently writing sci-fi story which contains a lot of scientific explanations. I would like, if possible to run some of the ideas past some people who know something on the subject. Can somone please tell me where i can ask these questions and if it's ok to ask these questions in this forum?

Thanks a lot

I thought the whole point of sci-fi was that the concepts *weren't* physically possible?
 
  • #4
Thanks :)

Background: There is an Alien race who have lived and evolved for about 60 million years. They have been in a technological advancement for the majority of that time. They have had insterstellar travel for about 50 million years.

The way they move around the galaxy is as follows:

Manipulation of a supermassive black hole (SMBH). My theory is that they create a massive magnetic field close to the SMBH, as the magnetic field grows, part of it is drawen into the black hole, and the other part magnetic field is sent out into space to a point which we could call A (i don't know how yet) when the magnetic field expanding, the SMBH begins pulling the magnetic fied into it, thus pulling point A closer to the SMBH, now my idea is that anything that passes point A is pulled towards the SMBH.

My question is could a magnetic field be manipulated in this way? Can it be use to 'grip' on to space as a medium.

Or is this question just stupid :(

I will have more later :)
 
  • #5
cristo is right ... that is so logic to me too ... there was a sci-fiction writer who wrote about robots and computers and mobiles few decades later ...and he said it is in the 2000 that it will be done ... and it is real we are living what he said so ... everything seems impossible is a great beginning to reality
 
  • #6
You're not in the right place to discuss this. Did you read the guidelines when you signed up? This a place to talk about coherent scientific theories, not sci-fi speculation!
 
  • #7
cristo said:
You're not in the right place to discuss this. Did you read the guidelines when you signed up? This a place to talk about coherent scientific theories, not sci-fi speculation!

I moved it to the PF Lounge General Discussion forum for now.
 
  • #8
berkeman said:
I moved it to the PF Lounge General Discussion forum for now.

In retrospect, reading back over my post, it did sound a bit harsh.

@Darth Bandon: Sorry, my post was very blunt! However, your suggestion isn't physically possible, although you're writing sci-fi, as I mentioned above, it doesn't really need to be. But, suppose your "alien civilisation" had managed to manipulate magnetic fields in such a way, surely, in using such a method to travel through space, one would simply be drawn into the black hole?!
 
  • #9
cristo said:
In retrospect, reading back over my post, it did sound a bit harsh.

@Darth Bandon: Sorry, my post was very blunt! However, your suggestion isn't physically possible, although you're writing sci-fi, as I mentioned above, it doesn't really need to be. But, suppose your "alien civilisation" had managed to manipulate magnetic fields in such a way, surely, in using such a method to travel through space, one would simply be drawn into the black hole?!

No worries :)

I will try and do a diagram of what i mean and post it here.
 
  • #10
Another Question :)

Is it possible to send sub-atomic particles through atoms?

What I mean is, is it possible to shoot sub-atomic particles through atoms like a bullet is shot through a target?

If so, would this sub-atomic particles show signs of contact with the atoms, e.g. damage, pieces of the atoms they made contact with?
 
  • #11
Darth Bandon said:
Another Question :)

Is it possible to send sub-atomic particles through atoms?

What I mean is, is it possible to shoot sub-atomic particles through atoms like a bullet is shot through a target?

If so, would this sub-atomic particles show signs of contact with the atoms, e.g. damage, pieces of the atoms they made contact with?

See Rutherford's Scattering experiment. Or did you mean through the nucleus of an atom?
 
  • #12
Darth Bandon said:
Another Question :)

Is it possible to send sub-atomic particles through atoms?

What I mean is, is it possible to shoot sub-atomic particles through atoms like a bullet is shot through a target?

If so, would this sub-atomic particles show signs of contact with the atoms, e.g. damage, pieces of the atoms they made contact with?

It's done all the time. Particle accelerators are used for many kinds of particle-particle collision experiments:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_accelerator
 
  • #13
My idea is that particles are fired through matter, and the particles record the following:
The position of the atom
The element of the atom

This of course is done on a large scale. e.g. firing particles through the Earth to determine the above data
 
  • #14
Darth Bandon said:
My idea is that particles are fired through matter, and the particles record the following:
The position of the atom
The element of the atom

This of course is done on a large scale. e.g. firing particles through the Earth to determine the above data

Weeelllll, it depends. You can do that sort of thing on a limited basis. The more general way to identify the components of a substance is with a mass spectrometer (you can wiki or google that if you want more info). Also look up Scanning Tunneling Microscope (not sure of the spelling) for more info on "seeing" the position of atoms.

As for shooting stuff though the Earth, that's more in the realm of existing sci-fi, like in Buckaroo Banzai.
 
  • #15
Darth Bandon said:
My idea is that particles are fired through matter, and the particles record the following:
The position of the atom
The element of the atom
Yes, these things are routinely done in physics labs.

Atomic positions (aka crystal structure) are determined by diffraction measurements (electron, neutron or x-ray diffraction) or by electron microscopy (look up TEM, STM). All of these methods involve shooting particles (electrons, neutrons or x-ray photons) at the sample of interest, and recording the effect of the sample on the emerging particles.

Elemental analysis is also possible with a standard XRD (x-ray diffraction) or TEM (tunneling/transmission electron microscopy) set-up. A simple diffractogram itself tells you what material you are analysing, but it's not great for telling you about components that make up less than 2% of the sample mass. Specifically for elemental analysis, these instruments are additionally outfitted with an EDS (for energy dispersive spectroscopy, sometime called EDAX - energy dispersive analysis of x-rays) or XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) detector that tell you how much of different elements is present in the sample.

<Google the keywords above for more info>

The problem with applying these methods to the Earth is that...well it won't work. The Earth is not a crystalline solid (it's atoms do not have fixed, periodic positions), and it's too big - it'll absorb all the particles shot at it, and any sencdary emissions from its interior. Moreover, much of the Earth is liquid, semisolid or otherwise in continuous relative motion, and the atoms don't stay fixed in place. So, finding the atomic positions for the Earth is completely meaningless.

However, finding the elemental/chemical composition of the Earth is not meaningless, but only impossible. This of course, doesn't mean you can't concoct a scheme for a scifi story. You can either come up with some ultra-high energy photon or maybe some kind of neutrino-based analysis method that you don't go into the details of.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
berkeman said:
As for shooting stuff though the Earth, that's more in the realm of existing sci-fi, like in Buckaroo Banzai.

how about neutrinos? ref
"The sun emits vast numbers of neutrinos which can pass through the Earth with little or no interaction."
 
  • #17
Ouabache said:
how about neutrinos? ref
"The sun emits vast numbers of neutrinos which can pass through the Earth with little or no interaction."

Yeah, I thought about mentioning them, but they don't interact with matter enough to matter :biggrin:
 

FAQ: Question about a number of Physics ideas

1. What is the difference between theory and law in physics?

Theories in physics are explanations of observed phenomena and are based on a set of principles or laws. Laws, on the other hand, are descriptions of observed phenomena and are based on empirical evidence. Theories are more comprehensive and can change or be replaced over time as new evidence is discovered, whereas laws are more fundamental and tend to remain constant.

2. How does the scientific method apply to physics?

The scientific method is a systematic approach to acquiring knowledge, and it applies to physics in the following steps:

  • Observation: Scientists make observations of natural phenomena.
  • Hypothesis: A tentative explanation is proposed to explain the observations.
  • Experimentation: Tests are designed to gather data that can either support or refute the hypothesis.
  • Analysis: Data is analyzed to determine if the hypothesis is supported or not.
  • Conclusion: The results of the experiment are used to either accept or reject the hypothesis.
  • Replication: The experiment is repeated by other scientists to confirm the results.

3. What is the role of mathematics in physics?

Mathematics is essential in physics as it provides the language and tools to describe and analyze physical phenomena. It enables physicists to make precise predictions about the behavior of systems and to test these predictions through experiments. Many physical laws and theories are expressed in mathematical equations, making mathematics a fundamental tool in understanding the natural world.

4. Can physics explain everything in the universe?

Physics is the study of matter, energy, and the interactions between them. While it can explain a vast array of phenomena, it is not capable of explaining everything in the universe. Some aspects of the universe, such as consciousness and emotions, fall outside the realm of physics and are better explored through other disciplines such as psychology and philosophy.

5. What are some current areas of research in physics?

Some current areas of research in physics include quantum mechanics, particle physics, astrophysics, cosmology, and biophysics. Scientists are also exploring new technologies such as quantum computing and nanotechnology. Additionally, there is ongoing research on topics such as dark matter, dark energy, and the origin and structure of the universe.

Back
Top