Question about a Riccati type diff eq.

In summary: A particular solution of the Riccati ODE can be found if a particular solution f1(x) of the associated second order linear ODE is known.In summary, to solve a Riccati type differential equation, a particular solution is needed. This can be found by transforming the equation into a second order linear ODE and solving for a particular solution. However, the general solution may not include this particular solution, and the second constant in the general solution can be determined by rewriting the solution in terms of a single constant. It is also possible to solve the associated second order linear ODE directly using classical methods, which may yield a particular solution for the Riccati equation.
  • #1
kenano
4
0
[tex]\acute{y} = \frac{1}{t^{2}} -\frac{y}{t} - y^{2} [/tex]

To solve a Riccati type diff eq a particular solution is needed. In our case it is: [tex]y_{1} = -\frac{1}{t}[/tex]

By setting
[tex]y= y_{1}+\frac{1}{u}= -\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u}[/tex]

and differentiating this
[tex]\acute{y}= \frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{u'}{u^{2}}[/tex]

Substituting for y and y' in the first original equation:
[tex]\frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{u'}{u^{2}}= \frac{1}{t^{2}}-\frac{1}{t}(-\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u})-(-\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{u})^{2}[/tex]

This yields the general solution:
[tex]y= -\frac{1}{t}+\frac{1}{\frac{t}{2}+\frac{K}{t}}[/tex]

(K being a constant)

But, according to the general solution above, it isn't possible to have a particular solution:
[tex]y_{1}= -\frac{1}{t}[/tex]
since we can't have the second term at the right-hand side zero.

So, am i missing something?

Thanks for help in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To solve a Riccati type diff eq a particular solution is needed
Not necessarily.
Often it is easier to transform the Riccati ODE into a second order linear ODE which can be solved without knowing a particular solution.
 

Attachments

  • RiccatiODE.JPG
    RiccatiODE.JPG
    13.8 KB · Views: 422
  • #3
Thank you for your answer Jacquelin. I still have some questions.

-We have two constants in the solution to a first order equation because of the intermediate second order diff eq. But the original eq is a first order one. Then how could the second constant be determined in a boundary value problem? Or one of them is zero automatically?
-It seems that we still cannot have the particular solution y1=-1/t according to new solution. Does it mean it is a singular solution?
-How did you solve the intermediate second order diff eq with variable coefficients without series expansion?
 
  • #4
We have two constants in the solution to a first order equation because of the intermediate second order diff eq. But the original eq is a first order one. Then how could the second constant be determined in a boundary value problem? Or one of them is zero automatically?
In fact there is only one constant in the solution (due to the proportional relationship y=f'/f )
Let c=c1/c2 and rewrite the general solution as :
y = (c t²-1)/(t(c t²+1))

It seems that we still cannot have the particular solution y1=-1/t according to new solution. Does it mean it is a singular solution?
No, we can have the solution y1=-1/t . It corresponds to the case of c=0.

How did you solve the intermediate second order diff eq with variable coefficients without series expansion?

The intermediate linear second order ODE f''+(1/t)f'-(1/t²)f=0 is homogeneous. So, referring to the usual method, the characteristic equation corresponding to solutions of the form t^k is :
k(k-1)+k-1=0 which roots are k=1 and k=-1 so, the solution of the ODE is :
f = c1 t + c2 / t
 
  • #5
Now it's all clear. Thank you very much.
 
  • #6
This was a particular case of Riccati equation.
The general Riccati ODE :
y'' = p(x) + q(x) y + r(x) y²
is tansformed into a second order linear ODE by :
y = -(1/r) f ' / f
where f(x) is the unknown function.

Of course, this transformation has interest only if the second order linear ODE is easy to solve directly, thanks to convenient classical methods : a lot have known solutions with elementary functions or with well-known special functions.
 

FAQ: Question about a Riccati type diff eq.

What is a Riccati type differential equation?

A Riccati type differential equation is a type of non-linear differential equation that has the form of dy/dx = f(x) + g(x)y + h(x)y2. It is named after Italian mathematician Jacopo Riccati, who first studied this type of equation in the 18th century.

What makes a Riccati type differential equation difficult to solve?

Riccati type differential equations are difficult to solve because they are non-linear, which means that the variables are not directly proportional to each other. This makes it challenging to find a general solution that applies to all possible values of the variables.

What are some real-world applications of Riccati type differential equations?

Riccati type differential equations have many applications in physics, engineering, and economics. They can be used to model the behavior of systems that involve non-linear relationships, such as population growth, chemical reactions, and heat transfer.

Are there any special methods for solving Riccati type differential equations?

Yes, there are a few special methods that can be used to solve Riccati type differential equations. These include the substitution method, the Bernoulli method, and the Lie symmetry method. However, these methods may not always work for all types of Riccati equations and may require some mathematical manipulation.

Are there any software programs that can solve Riccati type differential equations?

Yes, there are many software programs that can solve Riccati type differential equations, such as Mathematica, Maple, and MATLAB. These programs use numerical methods to approximate the solution to the equation, which can be helpful when an exact solution is not possible to find analytically.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top