Question about arc length and the condition dx/dt > 0

In summary, the condition dx/dt > 0 is necessary in order for the integral formula for arc length to work. If dx/dt < 0, then the arc length will be different from what is expected.
  • #1
songoku
2,368
349
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
none
This is not homework

1686303490716.png


That passage is from James Stewart (Multivariable Calculus). I want to ask about the condition dx/dt > 0. If dx / dt < 0, the formula can't be used?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #3
BvU said:
Why not ? Can you find a counter-example ?
In my opinion, it can because from the derivation I don't see the need for dx/dt to be positive.

I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.

Thanks
 
  • #4
songoku said:
I just don't understand why dx / dt > 0 is written there in the text.
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #5
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end ([itex]dx/dt > 0[/itex]) or the right end ([itex]dx/dt < 0[/itex]). Some details of the derivation will change if [itex]dx/dt < 0[/itex]; in particular the assumption that [itex]f(\alpha) = a < b = f(\beta)[/itex] must be replaced by [itex]f(\alpha) = b > a = f(\beta)[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #6
Mark44 said:
If dx/dt > 0 then then x is increasing. Conversely, if dx/dt < 0 then x is decreasing.

Consider the parametric curve ##x = \sin(t), y = 1## for ##t \in [0, \pi]##. Graph this simple "curve" and determine its arc length from your graph. What does the integral formula for arc length of this curve produce?
The graph is horizontal line y = 1 and 0 ≤ x ≤ 1.

I think the arc length should be 2 because the curve is traversed twice, once from left to right for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and then from right to left for π/2 ≤ t ≤ π.

From integration, I get zero

pasmith said:
The length of a curve should be the same, whether you start measuring it from the left end ([itex]dx/dt > 0[/itex]) or the right end ([itex]dx/dt < 0[/itex]). Some details of the derivation will change if [itex]dx/dt < 0[/itex]; in particular the assumption that [itex]f(\alpha) = a < b = f(\beta)[/itex] must be replaced by [itex]f(\alpha) = b > a = f(\beta)[/itex].
I think I understand more clearly now from your post and Mark's example. The condition dx / dt > 0 is to ensure the curve is traversed once, only from left to right. If I want to use integration to find the arc length, I need to divide it into two cases, for 0 ≤ t ≤ π/2 and π/2 ≤ t ≤ π then subtract.

Thank you very much for the help and explanation BvU, Mark44, pasmith
 

FAQ: Question about arc length and the condition dx/dt > 0

What is arc length in the context of a parametric curve?

Arc length is the distance measured along the path of a curve. For a parametric curve defined by functions x(t) and y(t), the arc length from t=a to t=b is calculated using the integral of the square root of the sum of the squares of the derivatives of the parametric functions with respect to t.

Why is the condition dx/dt > 0 important when calculating arc length?

The condition dx/dt > 0 ensures that the parameter t is increasing along the curve, which helps in avoiding issues related to the curve doubling back on itself or creating ambiguities in the calculation of arc length.

How do you calculate the arc length of a parametric curve given x(t) and y(t)?

To calculate the arc length of a parametric curve given by x(t) and y(t) from t=a to t=b, you use the formula: \( L = \int_a^b \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2} \, dt \). This integral computes the sum of infinitesimal distances along the curve.

What happens if dx/dt is not always greater than 0?

If dx/dt is not always greater than 0, it means the parameter t could be decreasing or the curve could be moving backward in the x-direction. This can complicate the arc length calculation, as the integral might not correctly represent the true distance along the curve.

Can arc length be calculated if dx/dt < 0 for some intervals?

Yes, arc length can still be calculated if dx/dt < 0 for some intervals, but care must be taken to properly account for these intervals. The integral for arc length remains the same, but you need to ensure that the parameterization accurately reflects the curve's path, possibly by splitting the integral at points where dx/dt changes sign.

Back
Top