- #1
jorgeluisg
- 1
- 0
I am hoping someone might be able to explain the significance of the arrows in the following structural diagram of copper(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc).
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Copper_phthalocyanine.svg
Which I have also seen represented as dashed lines such as on http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/course/ityeartwo/html/colgate2.htm page (near the bottom).
My background is in physics so my understanding of chemistry is very rudimentary. From what I can recall, copper(II) should take 2 electrons in order to become neutrally charged, while nitrogen should have 3 extra electrons. The two N-Cu bonds without arrows should then make everything charge neutral since these two nitrogens only bond to two carbons, leaving a spare electron on each to bond to Cu with.
What do the arrows (or dashed lines) then indicate? They appear to indicate a bond of some form, but why should copper want to bond, or the nitrogens for that matter, if they are charge neutral? My research seems to indicate that the arrow might represent a co-ordinate bond but, once again, I don't see why the nitrogens should want to give up or even share their electrons if they are already stable, nor why the copper should accept them for the same reasons.
There is either something I'm missing, or I've misunderstood the significance of the arrows. In either case, I hope someone will be able to explain their significance to me.
Thanks in advance
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Copper_phthalocyanine.svg
Which I have also seen represented as dashed lines such as on http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/course/ityeartwo/html/colgate2.htm page (near the bottom).
My background is in physics so my understanding of chemistry is very rudimentary. From what I can recall, copper(II) should take 2 electrons in order to become neutrally charged, while nitrogen should have 3 extra electrons. The two N-Cu bonds without arrows should then make everything charge neutral since these two nitrogens only bond to two carbons, leaving a spare electron on each to bond to Cu with.
What do the arrows (or dashed lines) then indicate? They appear to indicate a bond of some form, but why should copper want to bond, or the nitrogens for that matter, if they are charge neutral? My research seems to indicate that the arrow might represent a co-ordinate bond but, once again, I don't see why the nitrogens should want to give up or even share their electrons if they are already stable, nor why the copper should accept them for the same reasons.
There is either something I'm missing, or I've misunderstood the significance of the arrows. In either case, I hope someone will be able to explain their significance to me.
Thanks in advance