Question about different statements of Picard Theorem

In summary, the discussion revolves around the various formulations of Picard's Theorem, which addresses the existence and uniqueness of solutions to ordinary differential equations. Different statements highlight conditions under which solutions can be guaranteed, such as continuity, Lipschitz conditions, and the role of initial value problems. The nuances between these statements reflect the theorem's applicability across different scenarios in mathematical analysis.
  • #1
MathLearner123
17
3
I want to prove following (Big Picard Theorem forms):\
Theorem.
The followings are equivalent:\
a) If ##f \in H(\mathbb{D}\setminus\{0\})## and ##f(\mathbb{D}') \subset \mathbb{C} \setminus \{0, 1\}##, then ##f## has a pole of an removable singularity at ##0##.\
b) Let ##\Omega \subset \mathbb{C}## is a open subset, ##f : \Omega \to \mathbb{C}## is holomorphic and ##z_0 \in \mathbb{C}##. If ##f## has an essential singularity at ##z_0##, then, with at most one exception, ##f## attains every complex value infinitely many times;\
c) Let ##f : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## a entire function which is not polynomial. Then, with at most one exception, ##f## attains every complex value infinitely many times;



I have proved that a) ##\implies## b) ##\implies## c) and that b) ##\implies## a) but I don't know how to start proving that c) implies a) or b). And another thing: Is mathematically correct to say that those points are equivalent? Thanks!!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
723
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
711
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top