- #1
mike427
- 6
- 0
hey there everyone, a friend and I got into a bit if a debate over what to do if a deer ran in front of your car. Basically, the two main points we are confused about is as follows:
1: should you break or accelerate right before impact? I argued that accelerating would give the car some lift and aid in survival of the impact. My friend said that maybe you should either maintain speed or break as accelerating or breaking doesn't really lift the car a significant amount.
2: would hitting a deer at 70mph compared to 100mph be better? The idea is that if you go faster you could try to gather more force on your end to barrel through the impact. However, going faster could just make the impact that much more dangerous for the passenger. So basically if you were going fast would it actually be beneficial to be going even faster for the impact?
Thanks
1: should you break or accelerate right before impact? I argued that accelerating would give the car some lift and aid in survival of the impact. My friend said that maybe you should either maintain speed or break as accelerating or breaking doesn't really lift the car a significant amount.
2: would hitting a deer at 70mph compared to 100mph be better? The idea is that if you go faster you could try to gather more force on your end to barrel through the impact. However, going faster could just make the impact that much more dangerous for the passenger. So basically if you were going fast would it actually be beneficial to be going even faster for the impact?
Thanks