Question about Interference Patterns in Kim Delayed Choice Eraser

In summary: Basically, the interference pattern is a function of the path difference and the deviation angle (of the idler photon on emerging) from the Glan-Thomson prism. The phase shift is a function of the polarization of the idler photon and the deviation angle.
  • #1
msumm21
223
16
I've looked at the DCQE paper by Kim, et al (arXiv:quant-ph/9903047) but I was not able to follow the math leading to the calculation of the patterns R_01, R_02, R_03, and R_04. Specifically, I was hoping to understand the source of the pi phase shift between R_01 and R_02. Is there a property of the idler photon (polarization, ...) that's different when it enters detector 1 as opposed to detector 2? Is there an "intuitive" explanation of how this relates to a phase shift in the signal photon pattern? Also, does anyone happen to know of a reference that explains the math of this to a reader like me that is not familiar with what these E+, A(*,*), ... functions are? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
msumm21 said:
I've looked at the DCQE paper by Kim, et al (arXiv:quant-ph/9903047) but I was not able to follow the math leading to the calculation of the patterns R_01, R_02, R_03, and R_04. Specifically, I was hoping to understand the source of the pi phase shift between R_01 and R_02. Is there a property of the idler photon (polarization, ...) that's different when it enters detector 1 as opposed to detector 2? Is there an "intuitive" explanation of how this relates to a phase shift in the signal photon pattern? Also, does anyone happen to know of a reference that explains the math of this to a reader like me that is not familiar with what these E+, A(*,*), ... functions are? Thanks!

good question msumm21. Below is my guess (I am not a scientist/physicist)

See figure 2 of Kim paper:

- Beam splitter BS (in figure 2) creates a path difference- reflection Vs transmission

Also deviation angle (of the idler photon on emerging) from the Glan-Thomson prism - will create a phase differences however this would not explain the constant phase difference as it would be random I guess
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hi San K. I may not completely understand what you are saying about the BS, so let me just say a few things here and maybe you can chime in with further comments. Everything below is referring to the idler photon unless stated otherwise. I think there are 2 paths to each of D1 and D2 as follows.

D1 paths:
prism -> BSA (transmit) -> MA -> BS (reflect) -> D1 (I'll name this path D1.1)
prism -> BSB (transmit) -> MB -> BS (transmit) -> D1 (name = D1.2)
D2 paths:
prism -> BSB (transmit) -> MB -> BS (reflect) -> D2 (name = D2.1)
prism -> BSA (transmit) -> MA -> BS (transmit) -> D2 (name = D2.2)

In both cases (D1 and D2) there is one path consisteing of 1 BS transmission + 1 BS reflection (paths D*.1) and another path with 2 BS transmissions (paths D*.2). Hence, I wouldn't think there's a difference caused by a different number of transmissions/reflections between D1 and D2 paths.

Are you referring to interference between the paths D1.1 and D1.2 (and also interference between D2.1 and D2.2)? Evidentially in half the cases D1.1 and D1.2 interfere destructively after BS and those cases correspond to 1 interference pattern from the signal photon, and then in another half of the cases D2.1 interferes destructively with D2.2 and those result in the PI-shifted interference pattern from the signal photon. However, I don't understand physically what the difference is in these two cases. Somehow a different polarization causes one of the other to have destructive interference and shifts the interference pattern of the signal photon? Something else?

Regarding the effect of the prism, I agree I wouldn't expect it to cause the PI phase difference.
 
  • #4
msumm21 said:
In both cases (D1 and D2) there is one path consisteing of 1 BS transmission + 1 BS reflection (paths D*.1) and another path with 2 BS transmissions (paths D*.2). Hence, I wouldn't think there's a difference caused by a different number of transmissions/reflections between D1 and D2 paths.

Signs matter! You have a +pi/2 phase shift in one case and a -pi/2 phase shift in the other, which gives you the difference you see.

I roughly sketched the math behind that half an eternity ago here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2241460&postcount=8.

It is a bit rough, but gives a good idea of what is happening.
 

FAQ: Question about Interference Patterns in Kim Delayed Choice Eraser

What is the Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment?

The Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment is a thought experiment in quantum mechanics that was proposed by Marlan Scully and Kai Drühl in 1982. It involves a setup where a particle is sent through a double-slit and then to two separate paths, one of which contains a device called a "delayed choice eraser." The experiment explores the concept of wave-particle duality and the role of observation in determining the behavior of particles.

What is the significance of the experiment?

The Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment challenges the traditional understanding of causality and the observer effect in quantum mechanics. It suggests that the actions of the observer can influence the behavior of particles, even after they have already passed through the double-slit. This has implications for our understanding of the fundamental nature of reality and the role of consciousness in shaping it.

What are interference patterns?

Interference patterns are patterns that result from the superposition of two or more waves. In the context of the Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment, interference patterns occur when the waves of the particle passing through the double-slit interfere with each other, creating a pattern of light and dark bands on the detector screen. These patterns can provide information about the behavior of the particle and its wave-like properties.

How does the delayed choice eraser affect interference patterns?

The delayed choice eraser device allows the experimenter to observe or erase the path information of the particle after it has already passed through the double-slit, but before it reaches the detector screen. By erasing the path information, the interference patterns on the screen disappear and the particle behaves more like a particle than a wave. This suggests that the act of observation can change the behavior of the particle, even after the fact.

What are the implications of the Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment?

The implications of this experiment are still being debated and studied by scientists. Some interpretations suggest that this experiment supports the idea of a multiverse, where every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a parallel universe. Others see it as evidence for the role of consciousness in shaping reality. Overall, the Kim Delayed Choice Eraser experiment challenges our understanding of causality and the fundamental nature of reality, and it continues to inspire new research and theories in quantum mechanics.

Back
Top