Question about lifting of a function

In summary, the discussion revolves around the concept of lifting a function, which involves transforming a function defined on a certain space to act on a related space, preserving its properties. The focus is on how this lifting process can facilitate the analysis and application of the original function in different contexts, potentially enhancing its utility in various mathematical and practical scenarios.
  • #1
MathLearner123
17
3
Theorem 1
Suppose that ##p : X \to Y## is a covering map. Suppose ##\gamma_0, \gamma_1 : [0, 1] \to Y## are continuous, ##x_0 \in X## and ##p(x_0) = \gamma_0(0) = \gamma_1(0)##. Fie ##\tilde{\gamma}_0## and ##\tilde{\gamma}_1## be the continuous functions mapping [0,1] to X such that ##\tilde{\gamma}_j(0) = x_0## and ##p \circ \tilde{\gamma}_j = \gamma_j## for ##j = 0, 1##. If ##\gamma_0## and ##\gamma_1## are path-homotopic then ##\tilde{\gamma}_0(1) = \tilde{\gamma}_1(1)##.


Theorem 2
Suppose that ##p:X \to Y## is a covering map, ##D## is a path-connected, locally path-connected and simply connected topological space and ##f:D \to Y## is continuous. Suppose that ##a \in D##. Fix ##x_0 \in X## with ##p(x_0) = f(a)##. There exists a unique continuous function ##\tilde{f} : D \to X## such that ##f(a) = x_0## and ##p \circ \tilde{f} = f##.

I don't understand very well the proof of Theorem 2:
Given ##b \in D##, let ##\gamma:[0,1] \to D## be continuous with ##\gamma(0) = a## and ##\gamma(1) = b##. Let ##\tilde{\gamma}## be a lifting of ##f \circ \gamma## with ##\tilde{\gamma}(0) = x_0##.

Ok. Until there I understand that he constructs the unique path-lifting.
Define ##\tilde{f}(b) = \tilde{\gamma}(1)##. Since ##D## is simply connected, Theorem 1 shows that ##f## is well defined.

Here I don't understand anything. If you can help me to understand.. from where is that ##\tilde{f}## function already defined? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The conditions of Theorem 2 require that (1) there exists a path between any two points of [itex]D[/itex] (ie. a continuous [itex]\gamma: [0,1] \to D[/itex] such that [itex]\gamma(0)[/itex] is one of the two points and [itex]\gamma(1)[/itex] is the other) and (2) that any two paths in [itex]D[/itex] between those points are path-homotopic.

Since the continuous images of path-homotopic paths are path-homotopic, it follows that if [itex]\gamma' : [0,1] \to D[/itex] is another path with [itex]\gamma'(0) = a[/itex] and [itex]\gamma'(1) = b[/itex] then [itex]f \circ \gamma[/itex] and [itex]f \circ \gamma'[/itex] are path-homotopic, so that by Theorem 1 the end points of the lifts of these paths are the same; this value therefore does not depend on the specific choice of path in [itex]D[/itex] from [itex]a[/itex] to [itex]b[/itex] but only on the end point [itex]b[/itex]. Thus the definition [tex]\tilde f(b) \equiv \tilde{\gamma}(1)[/tex] makes sense: it doesn't depend on [itex]\gamma[/itex], but only on the fact that [itex]\gamma(0) = a[/itex] and [itex]\gamma(1) = b[/itex]. Since we are guaranteed that there will exist a path from [itex]a[/itex] to any point in [itex]D[/itex] and that any two such paths are path-homotopic, in this way we can define a function on the whole of [itex]D[/itex].
 
  • Care
Likes MathLearner123
  • #3
@mathlearner: Use that simply-connectedness of ## D## (asumed in the problem) implies that ## \pi_1(D)=\{e\} ##, i.e., trivial. This means any two paths in ##D## are homotopically equivalent. Basically, there is one path between two points up to homotopy.
 
Last edited:
  • Care
Likes MathLearner123
Back
Top