Question about symmetry with potential fields.

In summary, the conversation revolved around finding the final velocity of an electron traveling between a cathode and an anode with a potential difference of 300V. The question was whether or not the potential at half the distance would be half of the total potential difference. The participants also discussed using conservation of energy and calculating the work done to solve the problem. Ultimately, it was agreed that the potential at half the distance would be half of the total potential difference, making the solution easier to find.
  • #1
mateomy
307
0
Quick question (I think anyway)

I'm currently trying to solve a problem that essentially is asking for me to find the final velocity of an electron that is traveling between a cathode and an anode of potential difference 300. At half the distance to the anode can I assume by symmetry that it would be half the total potential difference i.e. 150V?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mateomy said:
Quick question (I think anyway)

I'm currently trying to solve a problem that essentially is asking for me to find the final velocity of an electron that is traveling between a cathode and an anode of potential difference 300. At half the distance to the anode can I assume by symmetry that it would be half the total potential difference i.e. 150V?

You could... How do think that will help you?
 
  • #3
Well if I know the potential at one end is say, 300V and I arbitrarily set the cathode side to 0 for sake of convenience -knowing that it is only the difference in potential that is important- and I want two values; one half way and one full displacement, symmetry can help a lot. If I make that argument I can conclude that half the distance would be half the potential.
 
  • #4
mateomy said:
Well if I know the potential at one end is say, 300V and I arbitrarily set the cathode side to 0 for sake of convenience -knowing that it is only the difference in potential that is important- and I want two values; one half way and one full displacement, symmetry can help a lot. If I make that argument I can conclude that half the distance would be half the potential.

Oookaaay... still not seeing the utility of that for solving a problem which is otherwise quite straightforward. However, I am prepared to be amazed :smile:
 
  • #5
I was attempting to try it with conservation of energy.

[tex]
\frac{1}{2} m(v^2)_i + q\phi_i = \frac{1}{2} m(v^2)_f + q\phi_f
[/tex]

Where [itex]v_i[/itex] is 0, and [itex]\phi_i[/itex] is 300 and q is the charge of the electron. Manipulation of this equation, isolating final velocity I get a difference of potentials under a square root. That's why I have to make an assumption based on symmetry. Does that work?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
If I may suggest, why not calculate the work done in moving a charge q through a potential difference V?
 
  • #7
Hmmm, seemed to have overlooked such an obvious way of doing it. I will get right on that. In any case does my argument have any validity?

Thanks for the pointers by the way.
 
  • #8
mateomy said:
Hmmm, seemed to have overlooked such an obvious way of doing it. I will get right on that. In any case does my argument have any validity?

I'm afraid I just can't picture a way forward with it; to me it just seems to divide the problem into two problems with the same unknown quantities.
 
  • #9
I don't know. It only leaves one unknown being [itex] \phi_f [/itex] with the obvious exception of the final velocity. Which brings me back to the initial question, can I assume the potential would be half its max (or min) at half the distance? If it is, then I only have the one unknown of the final velocity. Maybe I'm overlooking something, but it seems pretty easy to solve that way as well so long as I can make that assumption with respect to the potential.
 
  • #10
The electric field between (sufficiently large) plates is essentially uniform, so yes, halfway between the plates the potential should be half as well.
 
  • #11
Great, thanks.
 

FAQ: Question about symmetry with potential fields.

What is symmetry in potential fields?

Symmetry in potential fields refers to the balance and uniformity in the distribution of potential energy throughout the field. It means that the field is equally strong and consistent in all directions and points.

Why is symmetry important in potential fields?

Symmetry is important in potential fields because it allows for easier analysis and prediction of the behavior of the field. It also simplifies the calculations and allows for the identification of symmetrical patterns and relationships.

How is symmetry measured in potential fields?

Symmetry in potential fields can be measured using various mathematical and analytical methods, such as symmetry operations, symmetry breaking, and symmetry groups. These methods help to identify and quantify the symmetrical properties of the field.

Can potential fields exhibit both symmetry and asymmetry?

Yes, potential fields can exhibit both symmetry and asymmetry. Some parts of the field may have symmetrical properties, while other parts may have asymmetrical properties. This can be due to external influences or the natural variation of the field.

How does symmetry affect the behavior of potential fields?

Symmetry can affect the behavior of potential fields in various ways. It can make the field more stable and predictable, or it can lead to the formation of patterns and structures. It can also influence the movement and interaction of particles and objects within the field.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
697
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
765
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
857
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top