Question about the no-cloning theorem

  • Thread starter jk22
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theorem
In summary, the conversation discusses a theorem regarding a unitary transformation that cannot be applied to cloning a qubit. The theorem states that the unitary transformation does not exist and provides proofs to support this conclusion. It is also mentioned that a unitary operator must preserve inner products between states, making cloning impossible.
  • #1
jk22
731
24
In this theorem we have a unitary transformation ##U|a>|b>=|a>|a>##

But isn't it obvious that this is a rotation on a subspace but this rotation should depend on both |a> and |b> ?

With this dependence it seems to me the conclusion cannot be reached since the unitarity is U(a,b)U(a,b)^+=1 but U(c,b)U(a,b)^+ is not forcedly 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not really clear to me what you're asking. The point of the no cloning theorem is that the unitary you give does not exist. Is that the conclusion you're saying cannot be reached? Can you be more specific and quote the proof you're reading and point us to the particular part of the proof you're not following?

In any case, a "rotation" that depends on the thing you're "rotating" is not a rotation at all, so that part of your comment doesn't track.

If we consider the simple case of cloning a single qubit with no working bits then the argument is pretty simple. We have that ##U|0\rangle |0\rangle = |0\rangle |0\rangle## and ##U|1\rangle |0\rangle = |1\rangle |1\rangle## (it is not necessary to assume anything about what the proposed unitary does when the target qubit is non-zero). Then if ##|\psi\rangle = \alpha |0\rangle | + \beta |1\rangle##, ##|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1##, we have by linearity that
##U|\psi\rangle|0\rangle = \alpha U|0\rangle |0\rangle + \beta U |1\rangle |0\rangle = \alpha |0\rangle |0\rangle + \beta |1\rangle |1\rangle \neq |\psi\rangle|\psi\rangle## for all ##\alpha## and ##\beta##.

With a bit more work, the argument can be generalized to arbitrary states and with an arbitrarily-big ancilla register for the cloning operator to use as working space. More general proofs use the fact that a unitary operator must, by definition, preserve the inner product between all pairs of states and show that any proposed cloning operator cannot preserve inner products between non-parallel, non-orthogonal states.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
U cannot be linear in fact it is not even an application since :

U|2a>|b>=|2a>|2a>=4|a>|a>=U2|a>|b>
=U|a>|2b>=|a>|a>

Which is a contradiction.
 
  • #4
Another proof that such an operation cannot exist
 
  • #5
To be complete only the null state can be cloned since it gives again a null state whicj is an impossible event.
 

FAQ: Question about the no-cloning theorem

What is the no-cloning theorem?

The no-cloning theorem is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics that states it is impossible to create an identical copy of an unknown quantum state.

Who discovered the no-cloning theorem?

The no-cloning theorem was first proposed in 1982 by physicist William Wootters and mathematician Wojciech Zurek.

Why is the no-cloning theorem important?

The no-cloning theorem has significant implications in quantum information and cryptography, as it prevents the possibility of copying and decrypting a quantum key without being detected.

Is the no-cloning theorem a proven law?

While the no-cloning theorem has been widely accepted by the scientific community, it has not been proven to be a fundamental law of nature. Some theories, such as the many-worlds interpretation, suggest that cloning may be possible in other parallel universes.

Are there any exceptions to the no-cloning theorem?

There are a few exceptions to the no-cloning theorem, such as the case of known quantum states or the use of approximate cloning techniques. However, these exceptions still do not allow for a perfect cloning of an unknown quantum state.

Similar threads

Back
Top