- #1
jk22
- 731
- 24
In this theorem we have a unitary transformation ##U|a>|b>=|a>|a>##
But isn't it obvious that this is a rotation on a subspace but this rotation should depend on both |a> and |b> ?
With this dependence it seems to me the conclusion cannot be reached since the unitarity is U(a,b)U(a,b)^+=1 but U(c,b)U(a,b)^+ is not forcedly 1.
But isn't it obvious that this is a rotation on a subspace but this rotation should depend on both |a> and |b> ?
With this dependence it seems to me the conclusion cannot be reached since the unitarity is U(a,b)U(a,b)^+=1 but U(c,b)U(a,b)^+ is not forcedly 1.