Question on particles/fields in QFT

  • Thread starter AuraCrystal
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Qft
In summary, the conversation discusses the quantization of a classical field into an infinite number of quantum oscillators and whether these correspond to particles. The concept of particles in quantum field theory is also discussed and clarified. It is concluded that the energy of the field can be interpreted as discrete "packets" which can be seen as particles, but ultimately, the field is the fundamental entity in QFT.
  • #1
AuraCrystal
68
0
Hello,

I've been reading a book on QFT (specifically, Atchison and Hey) and they say that a classical field can be expanded into an integral of harmonic oscillators. When you quantize the scalar field [itex]\phi[/itex], it becomes an operator. Now, this is an infinite number of quantum oscillators. Do these correspond to particles? Of course, you can also write out the Hamiltonian in this way; in other words, does the energy of the field equal the sum of all the energies of these particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, basically. You can consider each excitation of the field is a particle since each excitation is discrete and obeys the energy momentum relation E^2=p^2+m^2 (they will obey this relation if the field obeys the Klein-Gordon equation). But be careful with the notion of particles in QFT. In the end, QFT is a theory of fields and not particles.

Specifically, for example, [itex]a^\dagger_\vec{p}|0\rangle[/itex] creates a "particle" in a specific momentum eigenstate, and so this "particle" is not localized over any region of spacetime. So this may notion of particles is not quite in resonance with the normal notion of a particle as a corpuscular entity localized in space (to a point, or w/e).
 
  • #3
OK, so is it the modes in the Fourier expansion of phi or is it the quantum of the excitation that is the particle?
 
  • #4
Never mind, I just misread something in the book. ^_^; I think I get it now; the energy of the field comes in discrete "packets" which can be interpreted as particle, but at the end of the day, all they really are (from the standpoint of QFT) is "packets" of the field.

(Also, sorry for the double post. It won't let me edit my other one.)
 

FAQ: Question on particles/fields in QFT

What is the difference between particles and fields in quantum field theory?

In quantum field theory, particles are considered to be excitations of underlying quantum fields. Fields are mathematical entities that describe the distribution of a particular physical quantity (such as energy or momentum) in space and time. Particles are localized excitations of these fields that can interact with one another.

How do particles and fields behave differently in quantum field theory?

In quantum field theory, particles are described by wave-like equations and can exhibit both particle-like and wave-like behavior. Fields, on the other hand, are continuous and can exist throughout space and time. They can also interact with one another and create and destroy particles.

What is the role of symmetries in quantum field theory?

Symmetries play a crucial role in quantum field theory. They are fundamental principles that dictate how particles and fields behave and interact with one another. For example, the principle of gauge symmetry is essential in understanding the behavior of fundamental forces such as electromagnetism.

How does quantum field theory relate to the standard model of particle physics?

The standard model of particle physics is a theory that describes the fundamental building blocks of matter and the forces that govern their interactions. Quantum field theory is the mathematical framework that underlies the standard model, providing a way to describe and understand the behavior of particles and fields at a fundamental level.

Can quantum field theory explain the behavior of particles at the subatomic level?

Yes, quantum field theory is the most successful theory we have for describing the behavior of particles at the subatomic level. It has been extensively tested and is in agreement with countless experimental results. However, there are still unanswered questions and ongoing research in the field to further our understanding of particles and their behavior.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Back
Top