Question on starting a thread in S&D

[mangaroosh]

Hey guys,

I recently started a thread that linked to a website challenging the interpretation of the null resutl of the MMX, as well as Relativity; the thread was subsequently deleted. The purpose of this thread isn't to find out why, as I was made aware of the reason; instead I am just wondering if the guy who owns the site were to start a thread outlining the experiment he conducted, which he says challenges the interpretation of the null result of the MMX, would that satisfy the rules for posting here in S&D?

I have been in email contact with him, and he has said that he has submitted his work for peer review, but that little consideration is given to his findings, much like the way threads here are deleted without consideration. I am not questioning that policy, as I understand that if every crackpot were to be allowed get on his soapbox there would be no room for the sensible theories, but I'm sure that people can recognise how genuine challenges can slip through the net as a result of this policy.

Just having read the posting guidelines for S&D I was wondering, if he were to outline his experiment and his findings would it comply with the rules:

The purpose of the Skepticism and Debunking Forum is to consider advertised product claims, and claims of and evidence for unexplained phenomena. Thoughtful speculation and explanations are welcome. Overly speculative or unscientific theories and irrational interpretations of evidence will be deleted without explanation.

Please feel free to share any personal experiences that seem to involve the unexplained. We welcome and value your sincere contributions to the forum. After all, the first step in understanding any phenomenon is observation. You may or may not find that explanations are forthcoming.

Please advise, and if it would be "kosher" for him to present his case here, I will let him know.

cheers,
roosh.

 

[jtbell]

It is not part of the mission of PF to provide an alternative to the peer review process for scientific research.

 

[mangaroosh]

It is not part of the mission of PF to provide an alternative to the peer review process for scientific research.

How about a supplement to it?

 

[Evo]

How about a supplement to it?

Skepticism and debunking is not for independant research. You seem to have not read the rules.

we do not explore mainstream subject matter; and in particular, we do not explore new ideas about physics.

 

[LudusRex]

I understand the importance of open and respectful discussion when it comes to challenging scientific findings and theories. However, it is also important to adhere to certain standards and guidelines in order to maintain the integrity of the scientific process.

In this case, it is important to consider the source of the information and the validity of the experiment before allowing it to be presented in a forum such as S&D. Has the experiment been published in a reputable scientific journal? Has it undergone peer review by experts in the field? These are important factors to consider when evaluating the credibility of the findings.

Furthermore, it is important to keep in mind that the purpose of S&D is to discuss advertised product claims and unexplained phenomena, not to promote personal theories or unscientific interpretations of evidence. If the individual in question can present their experiment and findings in a respectful and scientifically sound manner, then it may be appropriate for them to post in the forum. However, if their intentions are to promote personal beliefs rather than engage in meaningful discussion, it may not be appropriate for them to post.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on the guidelines and purpose of the forum, as well as the credibility and validity of the information being presented. As a community, it is important to maintain a balance between open-mindedness and skepticism in order to have productive and meaningful discussions.