Question: Series Convergence for ((-1)^n*n!)/(1*6*11*...*(5n+1))

Click For Summary
The series in question is ((-1)^n*n!)/(1*6*11*...*(5n+1)) from n = 0 to ∞, and the main focus is on determining its convergence. The ratio test was initially applied, but it was noted that the correct series involves the product in the denominator, which complicates the analysis. The discussion suggests that an alternating series test may be more appropriate for this series. Clarification on the product notation was provided, indicating that it represents the multiplication of terms in the sequence. Overall, the community is exploring methods to assess the convergence of this unique series.
harrietstowe
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does the series ((-1)^n*n!)/(1*6*11*...*(5n+1)) from n = 0 to \infty
absolutely converge, converge conditionally or diverge?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I did the ratio test for ((-1)^n *n!)/(5n+1)) and I found that it diverges but apparently that is not the correct series to use. I do not understand how to implement the 1*6*11*... part.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's an odd series. This is the best way I've been able to write it...

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\left(-1\right)^n n!}{\prod_{k=0}^{n} 5k+1}

I don't know if this helps, but hopefully it does.

EDIT: Seems like an alternating series test would help.
 
Char. Limit said:
That's an odd series. This is the best way I've been able to write it...

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\left(-1\right)^n n!}{\prod_{k=0}^{n} 5k+1}

I don't know if this helps, but hopefully it does.

EDIT: Seems like an alternating series test would help.

What do the columns in the denominator mean? I don't think I have seen that symbol before
 
\prod is the product symbol: \prod_{k=0}^n a_k = a_0 a_1 ... a_n

So n! = \prod_{k=1}^n k.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K