Questioning the Solution for Elevator vs Rock Problem

In summary, the author of the problem is concerned about when the rock returns to the elevator's starting point. They say that the rock has a velocity of -15m/s when it returns to the origin and that the lift is at -2.5m/s from the origin. They also say that the clock is started when the rock is thrown and that the lift is at its position when the rock is thrown. They propose that the lift moves for about 10s so that the elevator can get to -25.15m and the rock can reach its peak and return to X =0. They then reset the clock to t=0.
  • #1
Darkmisc
220
31
Homework Statement
An elevator descends downwards at 2.5m/s. Seven seconds after this, a rock is thrown upwards at 15m/s. g=9.8m/s^2. When will the rock hit the elevator?
Relevant Equations
v = 15 -9.8t.
Hi everyone

I have solutions to this problem, but I am not sure if the premise behind them is correct.

I think this is the reasoning behind the solution for question d.

- Work out how far the elevator travels in the 7s before the rock is thrown, so 7x2.5 = 17.5
- Work out how far the elevator travels in the time it takes for the rock to reach its peak and then fall back to X=0, so 150/49 x 2.5 = 7.65
- This means the elevator will have a head start of 25.15m on the rock when the rock returns to X = 0.
- After this point, the position of the elevator can be given by XL = -25.15 -2.5t

The part of the solution that I'm not sure about is where they give the position of the rock with XR= 15t - 4.9t^2.

It seems like they are starting the clock with XL at -25.15 and XR at 0. However, at this point in time, XR is not starting from rest. It had already fallen for 75/49s. I'm not sure that the equation XR=15t - 4.9t^2 accounts for this.

When the rock returns to X =0, its velocity should be 15 - 150/49*9.8 = -15m/s. Its velocity at subsequent moments should be given by v=-15 -9.8t. Integrating this should give XR= -15t -4.9t^2. I think it is this equation for XR that should be equated with -25.15 -2.5t to get the correct value for t.

Is my reasoning correct? Or are the solutions correct?

Thankshttps://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/313668

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/313669

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/313671
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I can't view the attachments and I can't follow what you are saying. The best idea is to start the clock when the rock is thrown up.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #3
I can't view the attachments either.

Is the rock above or below the elevator when it is projected upwards? How far is it from the elevator when the elevator starts moving? That information is important for finding when the rock hits the elevator.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #4
Sorry, not sure what went wrong with the attachments

image_2022-09-03_230740784.png


image_2022-09-03_230836974.png

image_2022-09-03_230905692.png
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #5
Parts (a) and (b) look fine.

I disagree with the author of the problem about part (c). Here is why.
Both rock and lift start at point O. This is the origin from which positions are measured.
Time ##t## is measured with respect to a clock that starts when the rock is thrown.
At that time, the lift is at position ##D=-2.5~\text{(m/s)}\times 7~\text{s}=-17.5~\text{m}## relative to the origin. I don't see where the ##x_L(t)=-25.15-2.5t## is coming from. It predicts that at time ##t=0## the lift is at ##-25.15## m which would be its position if it started moving about 10 s before the rock. Am I missing something?

Part (d) is consistent with part (c).
 
  • Like
Likes Darkmisc, PeroK and topsquark
  • #6
Well, it says in the question that ##t = 0## when the lift starts to move and the rock is thrown at ##t = 7s##. That doesn't seem to be respected in the solution.
 
  • Like
Likes Darkmisc and SammyS
  • #7
kuruman said:
Parts (a) and (b) look fine.

I disagree with the author of the problem about part (c). Here is why.
Both rock and lift start at point O. This is the origin from which positions are measured.
Time ##t## is measured with respect to a clock that starts when the rock is thrown.
At that time, the lift is at position ##D=-2.5~\text{(m/s)}\times 7~\text{s}=-17.5~\text{m}## relative to the origin. I don't see where the ##x_L(t)=-25.15-2.5t## is coming from. It predicts that at time ##t=0## the lift is at ##-25.15## m which would be its position if it started moving about 10 s before the rock. Am I missing something?

Part (d) is consistent with part (c).
I think the solution let's the clock run for about 10s so that the elevator can get to -25.15m and the rock can reach its peak and return to X =0. It then resets the clock to t=0. I think this was the author's way of dealing with the 7s difference between the elevator's descent and the rock being thrown.

I also don't agree with the author's approach. It confused me and I think they've jumped between time frames without making it clear that's what they did. The answer they gave is 4.67s, which is less than the time it took for the elevator to get to -25.15m. I'm guessing they mean to add 4.67s to the ~10s, but even then, I think it'll be the wrong answer.
 
  • #8
Darkmisc said:
I think the solution let's the clock run for about 10s so that the elevator can get to -25.15m and the rock can reach its peak and return to X =0.
You can't reverse-engineer the problem statement from the solution and try to justify the answer this way. The problem statement should be written in such a way that the solution can be found without ambiguity. It seems to me that the author of the problem changed the input numbers and forgot to change the equation in part (c) to match the new numbers.

For future reference, the way to handle problems is to write separate equations for each moving object in which time starts when the object starts moving and use subscripts to keep the objects sorted out. For the lift, the equation is $$x_L=V_Lt_L$$ For the rock it is $$x_R=v_0t_R-\frac{1}{2}gt_R^2.$$Now the rock clock is ##t_0=7## s behind the lift clock. In other words, ##t_R=t_L-t_0## which makes the rock equation $$x_R=v_0t_L-\frac{1}{2}g(t_L-t_0)^2.$$ At specific time ##t_L=T## the lift and the rock are at the same place, i.e. the rock collides with the lift. This means that $$v_0T-\frac{1}{2}g(T-t_0)^2=V_LT.$$ At this point you solve the quadratic in ##T## with ##v_0=15## m/s, ##V_L=-2.5## m/s, ##t_0=7## s and ##g=9.8## m/s2.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Darkmisc

FAQ: Questioning the Solution for Elevator vs Rock Problem

What is the "Elevator vs Rock Problem"?

The "Elevator vs Rock Problem" is a thought experiment that poses the question of whether it is better to be in a falling elevator or to jump out of the elevator before it hits the ground, assuming both options result in certain death.

What is the solution to the "Elevator vs Rock Problem"?

The solution to the "Elevator vs Rock Problem" is that it is better to stay in the elevator and try to cushion the impact by lying flat on the floor. This is because the elevator provides some protection and cushioning from the impact, whereas jumping out would result in a higher velocity and a more direct impact with the ground.

Are there any real-life examples of the "Elevator vs Rock Problem"?

There have been a few real-life examples of the "Elevator vs Rock Problem", such as the 1945 Empire State Building elevator incident where a B-25 bomber crashed into the building and caused an elevator to fall from the 75th floor. In this case, the passengers who stayed in the elevator survived while those who tried to jump out did not.

What factors should be considered when evaluating the "Elevator vs Rock Problem"?

When evaluating the "Elevator vs Rock Problem", factors such as the height of the fall, the weight and density of the objects involved, and the impact surface should be considered. These factors can affect the velocity and force of impact, and therefore the outcome of the situation.

Is there a definitive answer to the "Elevator vs Rock Problem"?

No, there is no definitive answer to the "Elevator vs Rock Problem" as it ultimately depends on the specific circumstances and variables involved. However, the general consensus among scientists is that staying in the elevator and trying to cushion the impact is the better option.

Back
Top