Questions about a paper on reconciling JWST and HST data

  • B
  • Thread starter Cerenkov
  • Start date
  • Tags
    jwst Paper
In summary, the paper addresses challenges in reconciling data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). It explores methodologies for aligning observations from both telescopes, discusses discrepancies in data interpretation, and highlights the implications for astrophysical research. The authors emphasize the importance of a coherent framework to integrate findings from JWST and HST, ultimately aiming to enhance our understanding of the universe.
  • #1
Cerenkov
277
54
TL;DR Summary
https://astrobites.org/2024/02/17/cosmic-inconsistencies/
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07049
Insights from HST into Ultra-Massive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology
Hello.


I came across this article, https://astrobites.org/2024/02/17/cosmic-inconsistencies/ and followed the link to this paper, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07049 Insights from HST into Ultra-Massive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology and have read the .pdf

For the moment I have just one request.

Could the conclusion that the authors make please be explained to me in Basic terms so that I can gain a better understanding of what is meant? I would like to better understand the UV galaxy luminosity function and also what the authors mean when they refer to a cosmological solution to the JWST abundance problem.

Thank you for any help given,


Cerenkov.

 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Cerenkov said:
Could the conclusion that the authors make please be explained to me in Basic terms.
The article you linked does this well:

The findings from JWST observations have presented a challenge to the existing models of galaxy formation and early-Universe cosmology that led to a reevaluation of our cosmological model. Today’s paper demonstrated that any modifications to the cosmological model enough to explain the JWST data would be in conflict with the well-established HST data. Their analysis implies that a cosmological solution to the JWST mass excess problem might not be the most favored. Moving forward, the extensively validated HST data emerges as a crucial tool for interpreting future observations, signalling the importance of leveraging its well-established insights in shaping our understanding of the universe.

Edit: or even more basic terms:

Changing the ΛCDM model so that it predicts more massive galaxies at high redshifts is a bad idea because the changed model contradicts too many other observations.

Cerenkov said:
I would like to better understand the UV galaxy luminosity function
I don't think cherry-picking technical subjects is a good way to learn (one lacks the necessary background understanding and context), but if you insist the seminal paper is Charles C. Steidel et al 1999 ApJ 519 1.

Cerenkov said:
also what the authors mean when they refer to a cosmological solution to the JWST abundance problem
This refers to changing the ΛCDM model so that it predicts more massive galaxies at high redshifts.

Cerenkov said:
Thank you for any help given,
Although the Astrobites article is good, you might find JWST Sees More Galaxies than Expected more accessible.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #3
Many thanks, pbuk. :smile:

You were right, btw. Your linked article was just what I needed to read to understand this better.


Thanks again,

Cerenkov.
 
  • #4
Regarding the discrepancy between the abundance of massive galaxies in the early universe and the ΛCDM cosmological model, this other paper presents a possible explanation for this abundance within the framework of the ΛCDM model.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #5
Many thanks for this, Jaime.

Cerenkov.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
960
Back
Top