Graduate Radiation from a dielectric body

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the difficulty of finding a source that derives the spectral density of radiation emitted by a semi-infinite dielectric body at temperature T from first principles. While the spectral density for blackbodies is well-documented using Bose-Einstein statistics, the specific case for dielectrics remains less explored. It is suggested that anharmonic terms in the Hamiltonian are essential for accurately modeling the dielectric function, as a purely harmonic approach would yield negligible emissivity. The conversation also touches on the relationship between emissivity, reflectivity, and transmission in opaque and dielectric materials, indicating a potential gap in available literature on this topic. Overall, the need for comprehensive resources on this subject is emphasized.
Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I needed help in finding a source where the derivation of radiation emitted by a dielectric body is laid out.

The derivation of spectral density of radiation emitted from a blackbody at a temperature ##T## is given in many books by populating the energy states using Bose-Einstein statistics. However, try as I might, I have not been able to find any source where the derivation of the spectral density of radiation emitted by a semi-infinite body with a dielectric function ##\varepsilon (\omega)## and at a temperature ##T## is derived from first-principles (populating the quantum states).

I'd assume it should be straightforward since the dielectric function can be approximated by Lorentzian harmonic oscillators. Is it not so ?

Do you know any book/paper which discusses this in detail ?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it takes more than a dielectric function and/or oscillators. It is necessary to have anharmonic terms (essentially non-linear in the restoring force or non-quadratic in the energy) in the Hamiltonian, which may give you a complex dielectric function (with imaginary components) and a complex index of refraction. A completely harmonic Hamiltonian would give you a completely transparent dielectric and thereby the emissivity would likely be near zero. I think the solid state physics book by Ashcroft and Mermin discusses the anharmonic Hamiltonian. I don't have any handy references that have the precise derivation you are looking for, but hopefully this is helpful.
 
I'm surprised why this topic of radiated energy density by a dielectric body is not commonly dealt with from first principles. I'd assume it to be of primary academic interest.
 
Regarding what you mentioned, won't damped harmonic oscillators account for absorption in the dielectric ?
 
Karthiksrao said:
Regarding what you mentioned, won't damped harmonic oscillators account for absorption in the dielectric ?
I think the two are mathematically quite similar, but you might find it written up in the solid state textbooks as an anharmonic term. Meanwhile, one other thing to consider would be a Kirckhoff's law type equation where for an opaque material the emissivity plus the reflectivity is equal to unity. For a dielectric, I think you have a similar relation with a transmission term included. I don't know of a good source that discusses this concept in depth, but hopefully you might find one.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K