Randall-Sundrum Metric: Causes of Warping

  • Thread starter touqra
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Metric
In summary: In the paper above, there's this term called KK excitation. KK stands for the Randall-Sundrum metric and it is a way to calculate the extra dimensions in a space. I don't really understand how it is calculated in this metric...
  • #1
touqra
287
0
The Randall-Sundrum metric for extra dimension is the following:

[tex]ds^2 = e^{-2ky}g_{ab}dx^adx^b - dy^2 [/tex]

What is causing this warping or strange metric? I mean a space without force should be totally flat like what we deal with in SR, so there must be something that is causing this warping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thats a good question, and you really have to go back to their original papers for the full details (its semi inspired from String theory where say branes separated by a distance k are interacting). But the full computation of the exact metric from the field equations is afaik, fairly involved.

From classical reasoning though, its the same thing as warping in the vicinity of any massive object (eg say a cosmic string), eg the redshift at one end of (picture a compactified cylinder naively) the throat (or Brane) is quite naturally a different scale than the other end, this *warps* spacetime and crumples up that finite dimension, as you can see from that exponential factor in the metric.

(edit: Not that involved actually, because they ansatz the solution... see
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9905/9905221v1.pdf)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Haelfix said:
Thats a good question, and you really have to go back to their original papers for the full details (its semi inspired from String theory where say branes separated by a distance k are interacting). But the full computation of the exact metric from the field equations is afaik, fairly involved.

From classical reasoning though, its the same thing as warping in the vicinity of any massive object (eg say a cosmic string), eg the redshift at one end of (picture a compactified cylinder naively) the throat (or Brane) is quite naturally a different scale than the other end, this *warps* spacetime and crumples up that finite dimension, as you can see from that exponential factor in the metric.

(edit: Not that involved actually, because they ansatz the solution... see
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/9905/9905221v1.pdf)

In the paper above, there's this term called KK excitation. What does it mean? If it means excitation like the n-excitation states of a particle in a quantum well, then, I don't really understand how it is calculated in this metric...
 

FAQ: Randall-Sundrum Metric: Causes of Warping

1. What is the Randall-Sundrum metric?

The Randall-Sundrum metric is a five-dimensional theory proposed by physicists Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum to explain the weakness of gravity compared to the other fundamental forces of nature.

2. How does the Randall-Sundrum metric explain warping?

The Randall-Sundrum metric introduces the concept of a warped extra dimension, in which the fabric of spacetime is curved, causing a deviation from the traditional understanding of gravity and allowing for the possibility of warping.

3. What causes the warping in the Randall-Sundrum metric?

In the Randall-Sundrum metric, warping is caused by the presence of a negative cosmological constant, which creates a repulsive force that counteracts the attractive force of gravity, resulting in a curved spacetime.

4. Can the Randall-Sundrum metric be tested or observed?

Yes, the predictions of the Randall-Sundrum metric can be tested through experiments involving high-energy particle collisions or through observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation. These tests can help to validate or disprove the theory.

5. Are there any other implications of the Randall-Sundrum metric?

Aside from explaining the weakness of gravity and warping, the Randall-Sundrum metric also has implications for the hierarchy problem in particle physics, which addresses the large discrepancy between the energy scales of gravity and the other fundamental forces.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top