Ranking charge stored on three capacitors by a battery

In summary: Since ##C_2## and ##C_3## are parallel to each other their equivalent capacitance is ##C_2 + C_3##.Since ##C_1## is in series with the battery its equivalent capacitance is ##C_1 + C_2##.Since ##Q_1 > Q_3 > Q_2##, ##Q_1 > Q_2 > Q_3##.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1675976058981.png

The solution is,
1675976090665.png

I have a few questions about parts of the solutions,

- Part(b):

(1) Why do they assume that the capacitors are initially uncharged? Do they even need to make that assumption because it seems clear to me that we are finding the charge stored by each capacitor once the circuit has reached steady state. Would it not be better to say assume capacitors ##C_1##, ##C_2## and ##C_3## are charged?

(2) How did they get ## Q_1 > Q_3 > Q_2 ##? I don't understand their statement about if the capacitors are initially uncharged then ##C_1## stores the same charge as ##C_2## and ##C_3## in steady state. I though the answer should be ##Q_2 < Q_1 < Q_3 ## as it should be in the order from smallest to largest capacitance since ##Q ∝ C## (from ##C = \frac {Q}{V}##), correct?

- Part(d):

(3) I don't understand why the charge ##Q## increases from ##Q_i## to ##Q_f##. I thought charge would be conserved in this circuit, why is it not conserved?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
They don't have to assume that the capacitors are initially uncharged. I can see why the ranking done conceptually could be confusing to you. Perhaps you can do it by actually solving for the charges and the voltages. Remember that the sum of voltage drops and rises around a closed loop is zero.

Callumnc1 said:
as it should be in the order from smallest to largest capacitance since ##Q \propto C##
If you compare charge stored in capacitors, the capacitor with the larger capacitance is guaranteed to hold more charge only if the voltage across the capacitors is the same. In ##Q=CV##, if you want to compare ##Q##s you cannot only look at ##C## and ignore ##V##.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and PhDeezNutz
  • #3
kuruman said:
They don't have to assume that the capacitors are initially uncharged. I can see why the ranking done conceptually could be confusing to you. Perhaps you can do it by actually solving for the charges and the voltages. Remember that the sum of voltage drops and rises around a closed loop is zero.If you compare charge stored in capacitors, the capacitor with the larger capacitance is guaranteed to hold more charge only if the voltage across the capacitors is the same. In ##Q=CV##, if you want to compare ##Q##s you cannot only look at ##C## and ignore ##V##.
Thank you for your reply @kuruman ! Thank you for reminding me for looking at ##V##!

So in terms of proving their ranking ## Q_1 > Q_3 > Q_2 ## symbolically, do you know what steps I have done wrong please?

Finding the equivalent capacitance of the circuit,

##C_{eq} = 2C = \frac {Q}{V_1 + V_2 + V_3} = \frac {Q}{\epsilon}##

Adding up the positive charge on each plate,

##Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3 = Q##

Applying KVL to circuit,

##\epsilon = V_1 + V_2 + V_3 ##

##\epsilon = \frac {Q_1}{C_1} + \frac {Q_2}{C_2}+ \frac {Q_3}{C_3} ##

## \frac {Q}{2C}= \frac {Q_1}{C_1} + \frac {Q_2}{C_2}+ \frac {Q_3}{C_3} ##

## \frac {Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3}{2C} = \frac {Q_1}{C_1} + \frac {Q_2}{C_2}+ \frac {Q_3}{C_3} ##

## \frac {Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3}{2C} = \frac {Q_1}{3C} + \frac {Q_2}{C}+ \frac {Q_3}{5C} ##

## \frac {Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3}{2C} = \frac {5Q_1C^2 + 15Q_2C^2 + 3Q_3C^2}{15C^3} ##

## 7.5C^2(Q_1 + Q_2 + Q_3) = 5Q_1C^2 + 15Q_2C^2 + 3Q_3C^2 ##

## 7.5Q_1 + 7.5Q_2 + 7.5Q_3 = 5Q_1 + 15Q_2 + 3Q_3##

Many thanks!
 
  • #4
I don't think you know what you are doing. The first thing you need to do is to identify which capacitors are in series and which are in parallel, not assume that they are all in series which is what your equations say. This identification is done for you in the solution which you ignored for some reason. Your application of KVL is incorrect. You just don't set the sum of all possible potential differences equal to the battery voltage. If you don't remember how to use KVL, please read up on it.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #5
kuruman said:
I don't think you know what you are doing. The first thing you need to do is to identify which capacitors are in series and which are in parallel, not assume that they are all in series which is what your equations say. This identification is done for you in the solution which you ignored for some reason. Your application of KVL is incorrect. You just don't set the sum of all possible potential differences equal to the battery voltage. If you don't remember how to use KVL, please read up on it.
Thank you for your reply @kuruman!

##C_1## is in series with the battery
##C_2## and ##C_3## is in parallel with the battery

Since ##C_2## and ##C_3## are parallel to each other their equivalent capacitance is ##C_2 + C_3##.

I think what I did wrong with KVL was that I did not finding the equivalent capacitance of the capacitors in parallel.

So if I replace branch's ##C_2## and ##C_3## with ##C_{23}## I get:
1675994162675.png

So now ##V_1## and ##V_{23}## oppose the source, I think.

##\epsilon - V_1 - V_{23} = 0 ##
##\epsilon = V_1 + V_{23} ##

So I think what I did wrong was that I applied KVL for the whole loop.

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1675994074135.png
    1675994074135.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 78
  • 1675994385504.png
    1675994385504.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 90
  • #6
That's much better.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #7
kuruman said:
That's much better.
Thank you @kuruman !
 

FAQ: Ranking charge stored on three capacitors by a battery

How do you rank the charge stored on capacitors connected in series?

In a series connection, the same charge flows through each capacitor. Therefore, the charge stored on each capacitor is the same, regardless of their individual capacitances. The voltage divides according to the capacitance values, but the charge remains equal across all capacitors.

How do you rank the charge stored on capacitors connected in parallel?

In a parallel connection, the voltage across each capacitor is the same. The charge stored on each capacitor is proportional to its capacitance. Therefore, the capacitor with the largest capacitance will store the most charge, and the one with the smallest capacitance will store the least charge.

What is the formula to calculate the charge stored on a capacitor?

The charge (Q) stored on a capacitor is given by the formula Q = C × V, where C is the capacitance of the capacitor and V is the voltage across it.

How does the total capacitance affect the charge stored in a series circuit?

In a series circuit, the total capacitance is less than the smallest individual capacitance. The charge stored on each capacitor is the same, but the total voltage is distributed among the capacitors. The lower total capacitance means that for a given voltage, the charge stored is less compared to a single capacitor with the same voltage.

How does the total capacitance affect the charge stored in a parallel circuit?

In a parallel circuit, the total capacitance is the sum of the individual capacitances. Each capacitor stores charge according to its capacitance and the common voltage. Therefore, the overall charge stored in the system is higher compared to individual capacitors, as the total capacitance is greater.

Back
Top