Rare public involvement in electrical safety

In summary, the article discusses the Metrolenfant incident and how it was communicated to the public. The article praises the Washington Post for their graphics and recommends the article to engineers. There is no code violation for backstabbing wires. The danger level for backstabbing wires depends on the application. It is safer to use backstabbing wires for low-power applications than for high-power applications.
  • #1
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
11,308
8,744
https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...pid=hp_no-name_graphic-story-b:homepage/story

I am impressed by this article in today's Washington Post. In my memory, this is the most notable case since the NASA Challenger O-ring disaster that attempted to make the public understand the mundane details of an engineering problem. The usual reaction to technical details about infrastructure is SNORE.

Kudos to the WP for their excellent graphics. I recommend this article to all engineers as an example of good public communication.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jerromyjon
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Excellent presentation! Most people don't realize how "close to home" dangers like this are. The same problems occur in ageing or damaged residential electrical systems. I just recently discovered a "back-stabbed" outlet which had a loose connection in my home. I just happened to notice excessive heat and minor smoke evidence from the unused outlet which had a high wattage heater further down the circuit. The defective connection was a serious fire hazard and the added resistance caused a large spike in power consumption. If the general public had more basic knowledge of electrical safety many tragedies could be avoided.
 
  • #3
jerromyjon said:
I just recently discovered a "back-stabbed" outlet
What's one of those? (For the sake of UK readers, perhaps) Does it constitute a series or parallel resistance?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
backstab-outlet-holes-for-wires.jpg


It is a way to terminate wires without screws. You push the bare end into the hole and it is held by a jaw that prevents it from being pulled out.

Do you have those in the UK?
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #5
anorlunda said:
Do you have those in the UK?
I have never come across them, except, perhaps in a very naff lighting fitting. Interestingly, I did a Google search for the term and all the hits were non-UK sites. All the images involved US type outlets.
When I included UK in the search criteria, there were no hits and definitely no images of 13A sockets and distribution panels with anything other than screw terminals.
They sound pretty deadly for anything where there's going to be any movement involved. How do you re-wire them? Is it like barbed arrows, where you cut off the shaft and push them out of the other side of your leg? OOOOWWWCH!.
Anyway, thanks for broadening my knowledge yet again.
 
  • #6
You're not the only one to have concerns sophiecentaur. This Old House says

Backstabbed Wires What it means: On newer switches and receptacles, wires pushed in the back are more likely to come loose than those anchored around screw terminals.

Code violation? No. The practice is allowed, even for new construction.

Danger level: It depends. At a minimum, loose wires can cause a receptacle or switch to stop working. In the worst case, they can start a fire.

Solution: Check for backstabbed connections by removing a switch or receptacle from its outlet box. If one is backstabbed, there are likely to be more. Release the wires and attach them to the appropriate screw terminals on the receptacle.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and jim hardy
  • #7
I can feel smug about the very fussy regs in the UK. I can't imagine they would ever be allowed or anything other than very low power connections within appliances. Thoroughly nasty - yuc.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #8
I've troubleshot cheap "manufactured homes" around here and found numerous cases of lost connection at the backstab.
If you're lucky it'll just fail and you lose everything downstream of the open. A neighbor lost outlets on one whole side of her house. Once i imagined the walls sans paneling it was easy to figure out how the electrician had run the "daisy chain". That one was particularly confusing because the open was in the neutral side. Giveaway was - in the "dead" rooms all the neutrals showed 120 to Earth if anything was switched on..

I refuse to use backstabs, myself.

It takes a couple extra minutes to form the wires and put them under the screw terminals rather than just "strip and shove"(no prurience intended) . It's aggravating with #12 because it's so stiff , #14 is easy , but i won't use backstab on either.
What's unsafe at 15 amps is unsafer at 20.

I notice on newer fixtures that the "backstab" holes are too small for #12 wire. That tells me industry knows this was a bad idea to begin with.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #9
20 amp backstab is no longer permitted in the USA. Many localities require outlets to be pigtailed. What this means is that the source wires have to be connected to the wires going out of the box feeding the next outlet in such a way so when the receptacle is replaced that connection is not interrupted. Usually this connection is made using the twist-on wirenuts. This of course eliminates a backstab connection, or a loose screw for that matter, in one box from causing problems in another box. For all I know, some localities forbid the backstab as well. The wire can be removed from a backstab by inserting a screwdriver that pushes the jaw out of the way which releases the wire. When outlets are not pigtailed it is conceivable that a 120 watt load on every outlet in the circuit will put a fairly heavy load on the first outlet. I don't believe the code dictates how many or few outlets are on a single circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
  • #10
The NEC , for purposes of load calculations, treats a receptacle as 180 va (120vx1.5a) for general purpose plugs.
If you have a 15 amp circuit the max is 8 (you only load a breaker to 80% of its value) so (15a/1.5a per rec.)x .80= 8 rec.
For a 20 amp circuit you are allowed 10 (20a/1.5a per rec) x .8 = 10.6 so 10.
Any good electrician will usually limit general purpose receptacles to 6 to 8 on a 20 amp circuit.
Then there are exceptions for dedicated equipment and known nameplate loads.

Back stabbing #12 wire has been against code for a long time, and if any of our guys backstab ANYTHING we know they are lazy and won't last long.
In and around WNY almost every inspector requires pig tailing.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy, Averagesupernova and jerromyjon
  • #11
jerromyjon said:
If the general public had more basic knowledge of electrical safety many tragedies could be avoided.
To be more informative, I was alerted there was a problem due to the fact that with only one heater running on the circuit, turning my 40" TV on tripped the circuit breaker. I had previously ran two heaters, two laptops, the TV and a soundbar all on that one circuit without a problem. I may be mistaken but I think the problem can arise simply due to the small area of contact in the connection between the "jaw clamp" and the conductor. I had the same type problem with a microwave and a toaster in the kitchen, but that was due to a weak circuit breaker.
 

FAQ: Rare public involvement in electrical safety

What is considered "rare" when it comes to public involvement in electrical safety?

The term "rare" in this context refers to incidents or situations where members of the general public are directly involved in electrical safety, such as being electrocuted or experiencing a shock from faulty wiring or appliances. These incidents are not as common as other safety concerns, such as car accidents, but they can still be dangerous and should not be ignored.

How often do these rare incidents occur?

According to the National Fire Protection Association, there were an estimated 47,700 home structure fires caused by electrical problems in the United States in 2018. This translates to about 1 in 20 of all reported home fires. While this may seem like a low number, it is still important to be aware of potential electrical hazards and take precautions to prevent them.

What are some common causes of electrical safety incidents involving the public?

Some common causes of electrical safety incidents involving the public include faulty wiring or electrical equipment, misuse of electrical appliances, and lack of knowledge about electrical safety. These incidents can also be caused by natural disasters, such as lightning strikes or downed power lines.

How can the public become more involved in electrical safety?

The public can become more involved in electrical safety by educating themselves on the proper use and maintenance of electrical appliances and equipment. They can also report any potential electrical hazards to their local utility company or fire department. Participating in community events and workshops focused on electrical safety can also increase public involvement and awareness.

What are some measures that can be taken to prevent rare public involvement in electrical safety?

To prevent rare public involvement in electrical safety, it is important to regularly inspect and maintain electrical equipment and wiring, use electrical appliances according to manufacturer instructions, and avoid overloading outlets. It is also important to educate the public, especially children, about electrical safety and the potential hazards associated with electricity. Installing ground fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) in areas where water is present, such as kitchens and bathrooms, can also help prevent electrical incidents.

Similar threads

Back
Top