MHB Ratio of areas of squares - Challenging problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a challenging geometry problem involving the ratio of areas between two squares, ABCD and KLIJ, with specific vertex connections. The problem presents two scenarios with ratios of 1:3 and 1:4, prompting participants to explore solutions and geometric interpretations. A proposed solution uses similar triangles to derive the area ratio, resulting in a formula that simplifies the calculation of the inner square's dimensions. Additionally, the conversation touches on the behavior of a related function and its geometric implications, including the significance of increasing/decreasing areas and asymptotes. Overall, the thread emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in geometry.
Lancelot1
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have encountered a very difficult question in geometry. The question has several parts. I really need your help. I have tried solving the first and second ones, not sure I did it correctly, and certainly don't know how to proceed and what the results means. I would really appreciate your help in solving this tricky one...My solution is at the end, below the question.

Thank you in advance !

1) A square ABCD is given. Each vertex is connected with a point on the opposite edge (clockwise) such that the ratio between the closer part to the vertex and the edge of the square is 1:3. Find the ratio of areas between the squares KLIJ and ABCD.

View attachment 8006

2) Solve the previous problem when the ratio is 1:4 instead of 1:3.

3) Complete the following table:

View attachment 8005

What is your conclusion ?

4) Look at the graph of

\[f(x)=\frac{(x-1)^{2}}{x^{2}+1}\]

View attachment 8007

What is the geometric explanation to the function's behavior ?
What is the meaning of area where the function increases / decreases ? What is the meaning of the asymptote ? Can this function be generalized to the negative region ? What does it mean ?

My solution (assuming the length is 1):

View attachment 8008

View attachment 8009
 

Attachments

  • square problem 2.PNG
    square problem 2.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 131
  • square problem.PNG
    square problem.PNG
    11.9 KB · Views: 130
  • square problem 3.PNG
    square problem 3.PNG
    4.7 KB · Views: 129
  • square problem 4.PNG
    square problem 4.PNG
    8.7 KB · Views: 115
  • square problem 5.PNG
    square problem 5.PNG
    9.7 KB · Views: 133
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is an interesting problem. I found it easier to take the size of the large square $ABCD$ to be $n\times n$, so that the lengths of the segments $AE$, $BH$, ... , are $1$.

I think that the best way to tackle the problem is to use similar triangles. The triangles $ABH$ and $AIE$ are similar (having the same angles). The sides of the larger triangle $ABH$ are $1$, $n$ and (by Pythagoras) $\sqrt{n^2+1}$. The hypotenuse of the smaller triangle $AIE$ is $1$, so the ratio of corresponding sides in the triangles is $1:\sqrt{n^2+1}$. From that, you can find the lengths of the other two sides of the smaller triangle.

Now look at the line $AH = AI + IL + LH$. In that equation, you now know everything except $IL$. So you can use that to find the length of the sides of the inner square $IJKL$, which turns out to be $\dfrac{n(n-1)}{\sqrt{n^2+1}}.$ That gives the ratio of the areas of the squares $ABCD$ and $IJKL$ to be $\dfrac{(n-1)^2}{n^2+1}$.

Your calculation using areas is also a good method, and it is correct right up to the last line $S_{KLIJ} = S_{ABCD} - 3S_{\triangle DEA} + 4S_{\triangle DJF}$, which should be $S_{KLIJ} = S_{ABCD} - 4S_{\triangle DEA} + 4S_{\triangle DJF}$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top