Reaction Forces at Points A and B

In summary, when a uniform beam is supported at two points by pins, the reaction forces at the two points are determined by the weight of the beam and the forces applied to the pins.
  • #1
wilson11
15
0

Homework Statement



As shown, a roller at point A and a pin at point B support a uniform beam that has a mass 25.0 kg . The beam is subjected to the forces f1 = 50.0N and f2= 79.0N . The dimensions are l1= 0.750m and l2= 2.30m . (Figure 2) What are the magnitudes and of the reaction forces and at points A and B, respectively? The beam's height and width are negligible.

Please see attachment for figure.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75) = Rb *3.05
Rb=88.6

Ra * sin(53.13010)*3.05 = 50*2.3
Ra=47.1311

I am not sure if this is how you do this type of question..?
Also the answers are not correct as when I go to see if they are correct they come back as incorrect. The ansers i have tryed which are incorrect are, Fa = 47.1 Fb=88.6
 

Attachments

  • BEAM.jpg
    BEAM.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
you forgot to include the weight from the beam , the resultant of which acts at its center. Also, what you are calling and solving for Rb is actually Rb_y...the vert comp of the support (reaction force)force at the pin B.
 
  • #3
Sorry so what would the equation look like now (with the weight)?
Where do i put it?

Thanks
 
  • #4
When determining force reactions, the weight of the uniform beam may be represented by a single weight force acting at its center of gravity (its mid point).
 
  • #5
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75) = Rb *3.05
Rb=88.6

Ra * sin(53.13010)*3.05 = 50*2.3
Ra=47.1311
I may be very slow, but i do understand what you are saying, however i am haveing trouble to where in this equation(above) does the force from the beam go. Do i just times the weight by 9.81 to find N and then just add or what?

Thanks
 
  • #6
The mass of the beam in kg times 9.8 gives you the weight of the beam in Newtons. Place this downward force at 3.05/2 m from one end. Then redo your moment equations, which otherwise appear correct, except Rb should be Rb_y.
 
  • #7
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)*25*9.81= Rb_y*3.05

Is that correct above?
 
  • #8
wilson11 said:
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)*25*9.81= Rb_y*3.05

Is that correct above?
No-o. The moment from the 79 N force about A is correct. The moment of the 50 N force about A is 50 * 0.75. The moment of the weight force about A is 25*9.8 * (___?___). Add all three moments up and set them equal to Rb_y(3.05). Solve for Rb_y and continue...
 
  • #9
Sorry if I seem very slow, But is what you are saying is:
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81)= Rb_y*3.05

Please correct me if I am still getting it wrong..
 
  • #10
wilson11 said:
Sorry if I seem very slow, But is what you are saying is:
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81)= Rb_y*3.05

Please correct me if I am still getting it wrong..
You correctly multiplied the other forces by the moment arm distances to A to find the value of the moments about A...but you are forgetting to multiply the weight force by its moment arm...the moment arm of the weight force about A is the perpendicular distance from its line of action to A...which is how much ??
 
  • #11
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81*0.75)= Rb_y*3.05

I think i read that right. Is that what you mean? ^^^^
 
  • #12
wilson11 said:
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81*0.75)= Rb_y*3.05

I think i read that right. Is that what you mean? ^^^^
You are still not getting it right...that's OK, it takes awhile... The weight resultant force of 25(9.8) N acts at the center of the beam, at 3.05/2 = 1.525 m from A...so why are you using 0.75 m as the moment arm of the weight force about A when you should be using __?___ m
 
  • #13
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81*1.525)= Rb_y*3.05

I am sorry If i am wasteing your time, But is the above what you mean? I am sorry to be so slow but I am very confused about this question.
 
  • #14
wilson11 said:
(79*cos(15)*3.05)+(50*0.75)+(25*9.81*1.525)= Rb_y*3.05

I am sorry If i am wasteing your time, But is the above what you mean? I am sorry to be so slow but I am very confused about this question.
Yes, you now have it exactly right, :eek: solve for Rb_y. Now sum moments about B to solve for Ra, just like you did before , except don't forget to include the moment from the weight...,,, and once you find Ra, you can then find Ra_x from trig and Rb_x from Newton 1, and then Rb from pythagorus...I,ve got to catch some zzzz's...Ill get back to you in the morn or maybe someone else will chime in from the UK or beyond...
 

FAQ: Reaction Forces at Points A and B

What is the definition of a "Roller at point A, Magnitudes"?

A Roller at point A, Magnitudes refers to a situation in physics where a circular object, such as a wheel or ball, is supported at only one point and is free to rotate about that point.

How is the magnitude of a roller at point A calculated?

The magnitude of a roller at point A can be calculated by determining the force acting upon the roller at that point. This can be done by analyzing the weight, friction, and other external forces acting upon the roller.

What factors affect the magnitude of a roller at point A?

The magnitude of a roller at point A can be affected by various factors such as the weight and mass of the roller, the surface it is rolling on, and the external forces acting upon it. In addition, the radius of the roller and the angle at which it is positioned also play a role in determining the magnitude.

How does the magnitude of a roller at point A impact its movement?

The magnitude of a roller at point A directly affects its movement and rotation. The greater the magnitude, the more force is being applied to the roller, resulting in faster and more powerful movement.

Can the magnitude of a roller at point A be changed?

Yes, the magnitude of a roller at point A can be changed by altering the external forces acting upon it. For example, by increasing or decreasing the weight or friction, the magnitude can be adjusted, resulting in different movements and rotations of the roller.

Back
Top