Read article on Pulsars, not clear how a sphere sources pole-only emission?

In summary, the conversation discusses the strong gravity and magnetic fields of a pulsar, which concentrate radiation beams and only allow them to be emitted at the poles. The mechanism of this radiation emission is different for different types of pulsars, but the entire surface of the pulsar is a radio source, with the poles emitting the most. Astronomy is described as a highly deductive field compared to the lifesciences.
  • #1
ndvcxk
6
0
The pole still has extremely strong gravity, how can a sphere suddenly concentrate the radiation at the pole to be emitted there ?

As this is the only exit, should there not be a strong deformation ? How does the radiation make it to the pole, or, is the radiation we are getting only from the small pole area, the rest of the surface does not supply any ?

Thx, newbie!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The pulsar has very strong magnetic fields which concentrate the beams and only allow them out at the poles.

200px-Pulsar_schematic.svg.png

Form the wiki article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar
 
  • #3
Thx for responding. In the picture the beam is way too thin, should the emission not be
way, way broader, (yet, we assume rotation is so fast).

1) Is there any possibility of replicating a magnetic-field controlled radiation emission from a sphere to form a so finely-focused beam ? (The absence of the field must be tube shaped !)

2) Is the radio-source "creeping along" the rest of the surface before it hits the poles ?

3) Or, are we only seeing the emission of the poles, nothing else.

(No, I don't think there are little green men, they would choose a pattern..)

I find astronomy, (compared to the lifesciences) highly, highly deductive, it's a bit
like a fantasy field...
 
  • #4
ndvcxk said:
Thx for responding. In the picture the beam is way too thin, should the emission not be
way, way broader, (yet, we assume rotation is so fast).
The beam width would depend on the details of the magnetic field - not sure how you would measure it directly. If you knew the distance to the pulsar and measured th epulse width you could get the angle - but only if you knew the beam was aimed directly at you and so you were getting the full width. You can see the beam from an X-ray pulsar in a nebula where it lights up the surrounding gas.

2) Is the radio-source "creeping along" the rest of the surface before it hits the poles ?
3) Or, are we only seeing the emission of the poles, nothing else.
The mechanism is different in different types of pulsar but basically the whole surface is a radio source. Stuff hitting the surface is turned into a plasma that is trapped by the field, the charged plasma moving in a curved field gives you radio emission. The magnetic field blocks the radio signal everywhere except at the poles. The field at the poles is also more curved which gives the most emission.


I find astronomy, (compared to the lifesciences) highly, highly deductive, it's a bit
like a fantasy field...
There are more weird objects to consider but they are also very simple in some sense. YOu have isolated objects on their own that you can study individually - much simpler than the interrelated mechanisms in biology.
 

Related to Read article on Pulsars, not clear how a sphere sources pole-only emission?

1. What are pulsars and how do they emit radiation?

Pulsars are highly magnetized, rapidly rotating neutron stars that emit beams of radiation along their magnetic poles. This emission is caused by the intense magnetic field of the pulsar, which accelerates charged particles along the magnetic field lines, creating a beam of radiation that is visible from Earth.

2. Why is it confusing that pulsars only emit radiation from their poles?

It is confusing because, according to the theory of electromagnetism, a rotating sphere should emit radiation from its entire surface. However, pulsars only emit radiation from their poles, leading to the question of why the rest of the surface does not emit any radiation.

3. How do scientists explain the pole-only emission in pulsars?

Scientists believe that the intense magnetic field of pulsars is responsible for the pole-only emission. The magnetic field is strongest at the poles, causing the charged particles to be accelerated and emit radiation from these regions.

4. Are there any other factors that may contribute to the pole-only emission in pulsars?

Yes, the intense rotation of pulsars also plays a role in the pole-only emission. The rapid rotation causes the magnetic field to twist and concentrate near the poles, leading to the emission of radiation from these regions.

5. How does the pole-only emission in pulsars affect our understanding of electromagnetism?

The pole-only emission in pulsars challenges our current understanding of electromagnetism, as it goes against the theory that a rotating sphere should emit radiation from its entire surface. Further research and observations of pulsars may provide new insights and help refine our understanding of this phenomenon.

Back
Top