Real Analysis, liminf/limsup Equality and Multiplication

In summary, we proved that $limsup(a_nb_n) \le limsupa_n \cdot limsupb_n$ for sequences of positive real numbers. However, the inequality may be strict, as shown in the example of $a_n = \frac{1}{n}$ and $b_n = n$.
  • #1
joypav
151
0
Here are a couple more problems I am working on!

Problem 1:
Prove that,
$limsupa_n+liminfb_n \leq limsup(a_n+b_n) \leq limsupa_n+limsupb_n$
Provided that the right and the left sides are not of the form $\infty - \infty$.

Proof:
Consider $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$, sequences of real numbers.
Observe that for $n,m,l \in \Bbb{N}$,
$ \{ a_m+b_m : m > n\} \subseteq \{ a_m+b_l : m,l > n\} $
$ \implies sup\{ a_m+b_m : m > n\} \le sup\{ a_m+b_l : m,l > n\} $
Also, recall that,
$ \{ a_m+b_l : m,l > n\} = \{ a_m : m>n\} + \{ b_l : l > n\} $

Claim 1: $ sup(\{ a_m : m>n\} + \{ b_l : l > n\}) = sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup \{ b_l : l > n\} $

Proof of Claim:
"$\le$"
Take some $ a_m \in \{ a_m : m>n\} $ and $ b_l \in \{ b_l : l > n\} $.
Then, of course,
$ a_m + b_l \le sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup \{ b_l : l > n\} $
Using the definition of upper bound we can conclude that $ sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup \{ b_l : l > n\} $ is an upper bound for $ \{ a_m : m>n\} + \{ b_l : l > n\} $. (because $a_m$ and $b_l$ were chosen arbitrarily)
$ \implies sup(\{ a_m : m>n\} + \{ b_l : l > n\}) \leq sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup \{ b_l : l > n\} $

"$\ge$"
Choose $ \epsilon > 0 $.
Then $ \exists a,b, a \in \{ a_m : m>n\}, b \in \{ b_l : l > n\} $ such that
$ a > sup\{ a_m : m>n\} - \frac{\epsilon}{2} $
$ b > sup\{ b_l : l > n\} - \frac{\epsilon}{2} $
Adding the inequalities gives,
$ a + b > sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup\{ b_l : l > n\} - \epsilon $
This is for any $\epsilon$. So let $ \epsilon \rightarrow 0 $. Then,
$ sup(\{ a_m : m>n\} + \{ b_l : l > n\}) > a + b > sup\{ a_m : m>n\} + sup\{ b_l : l > n\} $

$ \implies $ Claim 1 is true.

Now consider the following sequences:
$ (sup_{m \geq n}(a_m+b_m)) $
$ (sup_{m \geq n}a_m + sup_{m \geq n}b_m) $

$ \forall m \in \Bbb{N} , a_m+b_m \leq supa_m + supb_m $
$ \implies lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}sup_{m \geq n}(a_m + b_m) \leq lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}(sup_{m \geq n}a_m + sup_{m \geq n}b_m) = lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}sup_{m \geq n}a_m + lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}sup_{m \geq n}b_m $
$ \implies $ 1. $ lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}sup(a_n+b_n) \leq lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}supa_n + lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}supb_n $
So we have proven the right side of the inequality.

Now we need to prove the left side. This part of my proof is, I think... wrong. Haha.
So we need to show now that,
$ limsupa_n+liminfb_n \leq limsup(a_n+b_n) $
$ \iff liminfb_n \leq limsup(a_n+b_n) - limsupa_n $
Using 1., $ \iff liminfb_n \leq limsup(a_n + b_n- a_n) = limsupb_n $
This inequality is obviously true.
$ \implies $ 2. $ limsupa_n+liminfb_n \leq limsup(a_n+b_n) $

Then, by 1. and 2. the proof is complete.Problem 2:
Prove that if, for all $ n > 0$, $ a_n > 0 $ and $ b_n > 0 $, then
$ limsup(a_nb_n) \le limsupa_n \cdot limsupb_n $
Show that the inequality may be strict.

I haven't had a chance to work on this much. Can I approach it similarly to Problem 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Yes, you can approach Problem 2 similarly to Problem 1. Here is a possible proof:

Proof:
Consider $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$, sequences of positive real numbers.
Let $x = limsupa_n$ and $y = limsupb_n$.
Then, by definition of limit superior, we have:
$ x = sup\{a_n : n > N\} $ for some $N \in \Bbb{N} $
$ y = sup\{b_n : n > M\} $ for some $M \in \Bbb{N} $

Now, for any $n > max(N,M)$, we have:
$ a_nb_n \le sup\{a_n : n > N\} \cdot sup\{b_n : n > M\} = x \cdot y $

This means that $x \cdot y$ is an upper bound for the set $\{a_nb_n : n > max(N,M)\}$.
Therefore, $limsup(a_nb_n) \le x \cdot y = limsupa_n \cdot limsupb_n$.

To show that the inequality may be strict, consider the following example:
$a_n = \frac{1}{n}$ and $b_n = n$
In this case, $limsupa_n = 0$ and $limsupb_n = \infty$.
But $a_nb_n = 1$, so $limsup(a_nb_n) = 1$, which is strictly less than $limsupa_n \cdot limsupb_n = 0 \cdot \infty = 0$.
Therefore, the inequality is strict in this case.
 

FAQ: Real Analysis, liminf/limsup Equality and Multiplication

What is Real Analysis?

Real Analysis is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of real numbers, sequences, and functions. It involves the rigorous investigation of the properties of these mathematical entities and their relationships.

What is liminf/limsup Equality?

Liminf/limsup Equality refers to the equality between the limit inferior and limit superior of a sequence of real numbers. These two concepts are used to describe the behavior of a sequence as it approaches a limit.

What is the significance of liminf/limsup Equality in Real Analysis?

Liminf/limsup Equality plays a crucial role in Real Analysis as it helps to characterize the behavior of a sequence and determine if it converges or diverges. It also allows for the comparison of different sequences and the identification of patterns in their behavior.

What are the properties of liminf/limsup Equality?

The properties of liminf/limsup Equality include the fact that liminf and limsup always exist for a bounded sequence, the inequality between liminf and limsup, and the fact that they are both limit points of the sequence.

How is multiplication defined in Real Analysis?

In Real Analysis, multiplication is defined as a binary operation on the set of real numbers that satisfies the properties of associativity, commutativity, and distributivity. It is also defined as a continuous and differentiable function in the context of calculus.

Similar threads

Back
Top