- #36
SiennaTheGr8
- 497
- 195
ZapperZ said:Then we are at a disagreement with what is meant by "conversion", because there is a physical difference between "energy" and "mass" from my perspective. Simply calling c2 "merely" a conversion factor doesn't remove the fact that there IS a "conversion" between mass and energy.
Then are ##v## and ##\beta=v/c## physically different quantities? Are ##t## and ##ct##? ##p## and ##pc##?
ZapperZ said:But how this fits into the thread at the level that the OP is asking is puzzling, and invoking advanced ideas of mass and energy into something like this is very confusing.
Yes, this conversation might be better suited for another thread. Cheers.