Real vs. Complex: Understanding the Difference Between su(2) and sl(2) Algebras

In summary, su(2) is a real algebra because it is a vector space over R with real linear combinations of its generators, while sl(2) is a complex algebra because it is a vector space over C with complex linear combinations. The standard basis provided for su(2) can also be used for sl(2) over C. The algebra is defined abstractly without any reference to a basis, so the standard representation by matrices does not affect its classification as complex or real.
  • #1
Lapidus
344
12
one standard basis of su(2) are the 2x2 matrices (i 0;0 -i), (0 i; i 0), (0 1;-1 0)

whereas the standard basis of sl(2) are (1 ; 0 -1), (0 1; 0 0), (0 0;-1 0)

Why then is su(2) called a real algebra, but not sl(2)?

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The answer is the field over which the vector space is defined:
su(2) is a vector space over R with three generators; the general element of su(2) is a real linear combination of the generators.
sl(2) is a vector space over C with three generators; the general element of sl(2) is a complex linear combination of the generators. It's sometimes called sl(2,C) or similar; sl(2,R) would be a different Lie algebra.

Incidentally, the basis you have given for su(2) also does perfectly well as a basis for sl(2), but over C. sl(2) is the complexification of su(2).

From a mathematical point of view the algebra is defined abstractly, without any reference to a basis. The fact that there is a standard representation by matrices with complex or real entries has no bearing on whether the algebra is complex or real.
 
  • #3
thanks Henry!
 

FAQ: Real vs. Complex: Understanding the Difference Between su(2) and sl(2) Algebras

1. What is the difference between su(2) and sl(2)?

The main difference between su(2) and sl(2) is their dimensionality. su(2) is a 3-dimensional real Lie algebra, while sl(2) is a 3-dimensional complex Lie algebra. This means that su(2) has only real-valued elements, while sl(2) has complex-valued elements. Additionally, su(2) is a special unitary algebra, meaning its elements have a unit determinant, while sl(2) is a special linear algebra, meaning its elements have a trace of 0.

2. How are su(2) and sl(2) related?

su(2) and sl(2) are related through a process called complexification. This involves taking the complex span of su(2) to obtain sl(2). Additionally, su(2) can be seen as a real form of sl(2), meaning it can be obtained by restricting the complex elements of sl(2) to their real counterparts.

3. What are the applications of su(2) and sl(2) in real algebra?

su(2) and sl(2) have numerous applications in physics, particularly in the field of quantum mechanics. They are used to describe the spin of particles and to study symmetries in quantum systems. They also have applications in differential geometry and Lie theory, where they are used to study manifolds and group theory.

4. How are su(2) and sl(2) related to other Lie algebras?

su(2) and sl(2) are both examples of simple Lie algebras, meaning they have no non-trivial ideals. They are also both part of a larger family of special linear Lie algebras, with su(2) being the special unitary algebra of dimension n=2 and sl(2) being the special linear algebra of dimension n=2. Additionally, sl(2) can be seen as a subalgebra of the special linear algebra sl(n).

5. What is the significance of su(2) and sl(2) in mathematical physics?

su(2) and sl(2) are crucial in mathematical physics as they provide a framework for understanding symmetries and transformations in quantum systems. They are also important in the study of gauge theories and the standard model of particle physics. Their relationship to other Lie algebras also allows for generalizations and applications in various mathematical fields.

Similar threads

Back
Top