Rearranging Equation: Solving for km(m+1) from km(m-1)+2m^2

  • Thread starter bubokribuck
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolved around rearranging the equation of km(m-1)+2m2 into km(m+1). The individual tried expanding the brackets and using different methods, but ultimately found that the two expressions were not algebraically equivalent. They then attempted to solve the problem using proof by induction, with the help of others in the conversation.
  • #1
bubokribuck
42
0
I need to rearrange the equation of km(m-1)+2m2 so it will look like km(m+1) in the end.

I start by expanding the brackets:

km(m-1)+2m2
= km2-km+2m2
= km(m-1)+2m2 (1)
or m(km-k+2m) (2)
or m2(2+k)-km (3)

Then I'm stuck. I've tried many other ways but they all become either (1) or (2) or (3) at the end. I have to find a way to get the final result as km(m+1), please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bubokribuck said:
I need to rearrange the equation of km(m-1)+2m2 so it will look like km(m+1) in the end.

I hate to break it to you, but these two expressions are not algebraically equivalent.

Let k = 0, m = 1.
 
  • #3
gb7nash said:
I hate to break it to you, but these two expressions are not algebraically equivalent.

Let k = 0, m = 1.

This is true, but if you mean to say you want the result to be km(m+1) + other stuff, then I suggest you try adding and subtracting km to the expanded expression, and then gathering km(m+1) from there.
 
  • #4
I must have done something wrong then. Will there be any solutions if k=(-1)m-1? I set k=(-1)m-1 to make life easier, maybe this is where I went wrong.

So is there a way to arrange (-1)m-1m(m-1)+2m2 into (-1)m-1m(m+1)?
 
  • #5
bubokribuck said:
So is there a way to arrange (-1)m-1m(m-1)+2m2 into (-1)m-1m(m+1)?

Unfortunately, no. Try m = 3 for both and you'll obtain different answers for each.
 
  • #6
Can't figure where I've done wrong, so I thought I'd post the whole question and start by scratch.

Q: Show the sum of the first m terms of the series 12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... is 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) (for m any positive integer).

This is what I've done so far.

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (m-1)2
= 0.5(-1)m-1-1(m-1)(m-1+1)
= 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)

Add -m2 to both sides:

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (m-1)2 - m2 = 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2

As the above equation represents the sum of the first m terms, so it must mean that
0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2 = 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) and if I can prove this then I'm done.

However, I figured that there's something wrong with the equation 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2 as it's only true for when m is even. For any m that's odd, it doesn't work.

So what exactly have I done wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #7
0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2 = 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1)

Huh?
 
  • #8
ArcanaNoir said:
Huh?

Is it not correct? I sincerely don't know where I've gone wrong. If you have spotted any errors could you please let me know?
 
  • #9
bubokribuck said:
Can't figure where I've done wrong, so I thought I'd post the whole question and start by scratch.

Q: Show the sum of the first m terms of the series 12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... is 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) (for m any positive integer).

This is what I've done so far.

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (m-1)2
= 0.5(-1)m-1-1(m-1)(m-1+1)
= 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)

Add -m2 to both sides:
Here you're making the assumption that m is even. If m was odd, you would add +m2. I haven't tried to figure this out, but maybe you could add (-1)m-1m2 instead to take care of the signs.
 
  • #10
I think I figured it out.
bubokribuck said:
Can't figure where I've done wrong, so I thought I'd post the whole question and start by scratch.

Q: Show the sum of the first m terms of the series 12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... is 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) (for m any positive integer).

This is what I've done so far.

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (-1)m-2(m-1)2
= 0.5(-1)m-1-1(m-1)(m-1+1)
= 0.5(-1)m-2(m-1)(m)
You'll need the part that's bolded above as well. You're assuming that (m-1) is odd.
bubokribuck said:
Add -m2 to both sides:
As I've said, change to "add (-1)m-1m2 to both sides".
12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (-1)m-2(m-1)2 + (-1)m-1m2 = 0.5(-1)m-2(m-1)(m) + (-1)m-1m2

Now simplify the RHS to get 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1).
 
Last edited:
  • #11
bubokribuck said:
Can't figure where I've done wrong, so I thought I'd post the whole question and start by scratch.

Q: Show the sum of the first m terms of the series 12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... is 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) (for m any positive integer).

This is what I've done so far.

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (m-1)2
= 0.5(-1)m-1-1(m-1)(m-1+1)
= 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)

Add -m2 to both sides:

12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (m-1)2 - m2 = 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2

As the above equation represents the sum of the first m terms, so it must mean that
0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2 = 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1) and if I can prove this then I'm done.
No, what you have above is the sum of the first m - 1 terms of the series. You are apparently doing a proof by induction, but you have not made any mention of this fact.
bubokribuck said:
However, I figured that there's something wrong with the equation 0.5(-1)m-2(m)(m-1)-m2 as it's only true for when m is even. For any m that's odd, it doesn't work.

So what exactly have I done wrong?
 
  • #12
eumyang said:
Here you're making the assumption that m is even. If m was odd, you would add +m2. I haven't tried to figure this out, but maybe you could add (-1)m-1m2 instead to take care of the signs.
eumyang, you have that backwards. The even terms are negative, and the odd terms are positive.
 
  • #13
eumyang said:
I think I figured it out.

You'll need the part that's bolded above as well. You're assuming that (m-1) is odd.

As I've said, change to "add (-1)m-1m2 to both sides".
12 - 22 + 32 - 42 + ... + (-1)m-2(m-1)2 + (-1)m-1m2 = 0.5(-1)m-2(m-1)(m) + (-1)m-1m2

Now simplify the RHS to get 0.5(-1)m-1m(m+1).

Mark44 said:
No, what you have above is the sum of the first m - 1 terms of the series. You are apparently doing a proof by induction, but you have not made any mention of this fact.

I have managed to solve the problem using proof by induction, thanks for your help :)
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
eumyang, you have that backwards. The even terms are negative, and the odd terms are positive.
I thought that was what I said previously. :confused:
 
  • #15
I think it actually was. I misinterpreted what you meant. I thought that you were saying referred to 12 - 22 + 32 -+ ... + m2, where m is even.
 

FAQ: Rearranging Equation: Solving for km(m+1) from km(m-1)+2m^2

What is the purpose of re-arranging an equation?

The purpose of re-arranging an equation is to manipulate it in order to solve for a specific variable or to make it easier to work with in a given situation. This can help in understanding the relationship between different variables in the equation.

When should I re-arrange an equation?

You should re-arrange an equation when you need to solve for a specific variable or when it will make it easier to analyze or use in a given situation. This can also be helpful when trying to find patterns or relationships within the equation.

What are the steps for re-arranging an equation?

The general steps for re-arranging an equation are as follows: 1. Identify the variable you want to solve for. 2. Isolate that variable by moving all other terms to the opposite side of the equation. 3. Use inverse operations to solve for the variable. 4. Check your solution by plugging it back into the original equation.

Can re-arranging an equation change its meaning?

No, re-arranging an equation does not change its meaning or validity. It simply changes the way the equation is presented and makes it easier to work with or understand. As long as the same operations are performed on both sides of the equation, the relationship between the variables remains the same.

Is it possible to re-arrange any type of equation?

Yes, it is possible to re-arrange any type of equation as long as it follows the rules of algebra. However, some equations may be more difficult to re-arrange than others, depending on their complexity and the number of variables involved.

Back
Top