- #1
iamsomeguy
- 5
- 0
Let me start with the story first.
A group of friends and I were playing air-soft. During one of the breaks between matches one of folks there started waxing poetic and talking about how air-soft guns could be turned into real guns. The discussion turned to using magnetic rails in the barrel to accelerate a .12mm pellet. How heavy the gun would be, the velocity of the pellet, force of impact. Then one of the folks there talked about how great it would be having zero recoil.
The discussion then changed to one of physics and how there wouldn't be zero recoil due to conservation of energy. The force to propel would still have opposite force. Some of us threw some hackneyed math around... but still nothing definitive.
I think it's not that simple of a formula as recoil takes into account design and weight of the weapon as well.
Anyone want to add some real work into this speculation? I'd love to get some input, and it would help settle a bet (at stake, one really nice bottle of booze).
:-)
A group of friends and I were playing air-soft. During one of the breaks between matches one of folks there started waxing poetic and talking about how air-soft guns could be turned into real guns. The discussion turned to using magnetic rails in the barrel to accelerate a .12mm pellet. How heavy the gun would be, the velocity of the pellet, force of impact. Then one of the folks there talked about how great it would be having zero recoil.
The discussion then changed to one of physics and how there wouldn't be zero recoil due to conservation of energy. The force to propel would still have opposite force. Some of us threw some hackneyed math around... but still nothing definitive.
I think it's not that simple of a formula as recoil takes into account design and weight of the weapon as well.
Anyone want to add some real work into this speculation? I'd love to get some input, and it would help settle a bet (at stake, one really nice bottle of booze).
:-)