Redhat vs. Mandrake (vs. Suse?)

  • Thread starter Smurf
  • Start date
In summary, duardo recommends using Ubuntu or KDE for a desktop and Gentoo for a very flexible system.
  • #1
Smurf
443
3
If you don't know what they are, you don't belong here. So that leaves, what? dduardo? Okay dduardo here you go:

Now. Last time I installed mandrake because the only redhat download I could find had a broken link (it was a long time ago - leave me alone). I'm using windows XP at the moment but I'm going to reformat rather soon and want to go back to linux - Which one do you use? I guess this might belong in software - move it if you like.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think he's running Gentoo. I considered installing a Linux distro so it would be easier to compile and run open source, but I've found it's easy enough with Fink and X11, so I've stuck with Mac OSX. The live evals I tried out didn't seem to work too well anyway.
 
  • #3
I used slack 7 way long ago. Linux is fun to **** around with and setup but once you've got it running there's not really much to do, unles youre a programmer I guess.
 
  • #4
Yes, my workstation is gentoo, but my servers are debian.

I would recommend Ubuntu/Kubuntu depending on which desktop you want (Gnome/KDE). Hardware detection is good and you have access to the huge debian library.

Gentoo is great because you'll have access to the newest packages almost immediately and the whole system is extremely flexible, but the installation can be very daughting to someone who is new to linux. It isn't that hard, but you need to be patient.

In fact, gentoo is so flexible you can even install it on top of OSX:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Gentoo_MacOS

----------

whozum, you might not find much to do, but many people, like myself find Linux to be an invaluable operating system. There are so many tools and applications that make it far superior to Windows in many repects.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I have used ubuntu for quite a while and I think it is good. It is really easy to install the os, and it is easy to install software (synaptic /apt-get).
 
  • #6
dduardo said:
In fact, gentoo is so flexible you can even install it on top of OSX:

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Gentoo_MacOS

Hey, thanks for that duardo. I didn't know you could do that. I considered running Mac on Linux, but this should be easier.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Redhat? Mandrake? come on man, that's old school. it's fedora and mandriva respectively :D. I've always wanted to run gentoo but it's a bit too big for my liking. Right now I run Ubuntu on windows. With the minimum requirements that windows vista will be needing, I won't be using it for a long time. Time to take open source to a next generation.
 
  • #8
There is nothing Vista could offer that would make me want to switch. I'm running 4 virtual screens. Right now I have Tvtime on 1, Firefox with 5 tabs on 2, Texmacs and Maple on 3, and ngspice running various simulations and emerge recompiling glibc on 4. At the same time I've got apache and mysql serving up dynamic pages. I can switch from desktop to desktop without any hesitation. None of the apps even flinch. It is amazing how robust the linux kernel/subsubsystem is. This is on a machine with 512MB of ram and a AMD2600. Try and do that on Windows. It has enough of a hard time trying to keep the tv stable.

I don't need no stink'n 3d windows. What's the purpose? To force me to buy more expensive hardware?
 

FAQ: Redhat vs. Mandrake (vs. Suse?)

What is the difference between Redhat, Mandrake, and Suse?

Redhat, Mandrake, and Suse are all Linux-based operating systems that offer similar functionalities. The main differences lie in their package management systems, user interfaces, and support options. Redhat uses the RPM package manager, Mandrake uses the urpmi package manager, and Suse uses the zypper package manager. The user interface may also vary slightly between the three, but they all have a similar look and feel. As for support, Redhat and Suse offer paid support options, while Mandrake is community-driven.

Which one is better for beginners, Redhat, Mandrake, or Suse?

All three operating systems are suitable for beginners, but it ultimately depends on personal preference. Redhat and Suse may be more user-friendly due to their paid support options and easier installation processes. However, Mandrake, being community-driven, may have a larger community and more online resources for beginners to utilize.

What are the system requirements for Redhat, Mandrake, and Suse?

The system requirements for each operating system may vary slightly, but they all generally require at least 1GB of RAM, 20GB of hard drive space, and a 2GHz processor. It is recommended to check the specific system requirements for the version of each operating system you are considering.

Can I switch between Redhat, Mandrake, and Suse?

Yes, it is possible to switch between these operating systems, but it may require a fresh installation. It is important to backup any important files before switching to avoid losing any data. Additionally, some applications may not be compatible with all three operating systems, so it is important to research compatibility before switching.

Which one is more secure, Redhat, Mandrake, or Suse?

All three operating systems are known for their security and stability. However, Redhat is often considered the most secure due to its focus on enterprise-level security. Mandrake and Suse also have strong security measures in place and regularly release updates and patches to address any vulnerabilities.

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
8K
Replies
123
Views
17K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top