B Reduced Planck Constant vs Dark Matter?

jwb44
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Is the Reduced Planck Constant the minimum frequently/movement/spin matter can have to exist?
Is the Reduced Planck Constant the minimum frequently/movement/spin matter can have to exist?

So if a matter were to spin lower than 1.054 571 817... x 10-34 J s, it when cease to exist?
Or would matter falling below the Reduced Planck Constant by classified as Dark Matter?
I heard that Higgs boson and axion have 0 spin. But are we sure that the Higgs boson and axion have 0 spin? that would mean 1.054 571 817... x 10-34 J s x 0 = 0. How could they exist with an energy state lower 1.054 571 817... x 10-34 J s? And what would be the lowest energy state possible for a particle to exist? And is it theoretically possible to reduce the 1/2 spin of fermions to 0 spin? what would happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
No,
No.
No.
Yes.
See above.
Its mass.
No
See above.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, etotheipi and berkeman
The response by @Vanadium 50 appears to cover it. The only note I would add is that Planck's constant does not represent an "energy state"; its units aren't units of energy.

Thread closed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top