Reducing one algebraic fraction to another

In summary, the conversation discusses a difficult problem involving fractions and the use of an auxiliary variable. The problem is solved using a specific method that involves substituting values for the fractions and rearranging them. The authors also provide a different method that involves exchanging variables. The solution is complex and difficult to understand.
  • #1
brotherbobby
702
163
Homework Statement
If $$\frac{x}{l(mb+nc-la)}= \frac{y}{m(nc+la-mb)}=\frac{z}{n(la+mb-nc)},$$
prove that $$\boxed{\frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}= \frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}=\frac{n}{z(ax+by-cz)}}$$
Relevant Equations
A theorem on algebraic fractions :
(1) If ##\frac{a}{b}= \frac{c}{d}\Rightarrow \frac{ax}{bx}=\frac{cy}{dy}##
(2) If ##\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{b}=\frac{e}{f}=\ldots##, each of the fractions is equal to ##\pmb{\left(\frac{pa^n+qc^n+re^n+\dots}{pb^n+qd^n+rf^n+\ldots}\right)^{\frac{1}{n}}}##, where variables ##p, q, r,\ldots, n\in \mathbb{R}##
Problem statement : Let me copy and paste the problem as it appears in the text :
1638702732501.png


Attempt : I am afraid this looks like a very difficult problem, despite being at the elementary level (high school). My glance through the text shows that the authors have gone about reducing the first set of fractions to the second directly, without making the (traditional) use of the auxilliary variable ##k## to which the whole of the first list is first equated to and then simplified. Let me go with this method.

Let the given list of fractions ##\frac{x}{l(mb+nc-la)}= \frac{y}{m(nc+la-mb)}=\frac{z}{n(la+mb-nc)}=\boldsymbol{k}\;\text{(say)}##.

This would yield ##x = kl(mb+nc-la),\, y = km(nc+la-mb)\,\text{and}\, z = kn(la+mb-nc)##.

Let me the take first term in what I have to prove (given above), viz. ##\frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}##.

Sunstituting for ##x, y, z## from above in terms of ##k, l, m, n, a, b, c##, we get :

$$\text{L.H.S (Term 1)} = \frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)} = \frac{l}{\underbrace{kl(mb+nc-la)}_{x}\left[ b\underbrace{km(nc+la-mb)}_{y}+c\underbrace{kn(la+mb-nc)}_{z}-a\underbrace{kl(mb+nc-la)}_{x} \right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(mb+nc-la)\left[mnbc+\bcancel{lmab}-m^2b^2+\cancel{lnac}+mnbc-n^2c^2-\bcancel{lmab}-\cancel{lnac}+la^2 \right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(mb+nc-la)(2mnbc+l^2a^2-m^2b^2-n^2c^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(\cancel{2m^2nb^2c}+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3-\bcancel{mn^2bc^2}+\bcancel{2mn^2bc^2}+l^2na^2c-\cancel{m^2nb^2c}-n^3c^3-2lmnabc-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2+ln^2ac^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(m^2nb^2c+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3+mn^2bc^2+l^2n^2c-n^3c^3-2lmnabc-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2+ln^2ac^2)}$$

and, upon rearranging, the first rational term on the L.H.S. reduces to :
$$\small{\text{L.H.S (Term 1)} = \frac{l}{x(by+cz-lz)}=\frac{1}{k^2(l^2ma^2b+lm^2ab^2+l^2na^2c+ln^2ac^2+m^2nb^2c+mn^2bc^2-l^3a^3-m^3b^3-n^3c^3-2lmnabc)}}$$
... (1)

Let me take the second term of what I have to prove (given above), viz. ##\frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}##, substitute for ##x,y,z## like before and see if the final expression matches the same final expression of that above.

$$\text{L.H.S (Term 2)}= \frac{m}{y(cz+ax-by)}=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)\left[ cn(la+mb-nc)+al(mb+nc-la)-bm(nc+la-mb)\right]},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)(lnac+\cancel{mnbc}-n^2c^2+\bcancel{lmab}+lnac-l^2a^2-\cancel{mnbc}-\bcancel{lmab}+m^2b^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(nc+la-mb)(2lnac-l^2a^2+m^2b^2-n^2c^2)},$$
$$=\frac{1}{k^2(\cancel{2ln^2ac^2}-\bcancel{l^2na^2c}+m^2nb^2c-n^3c^3+\bcancel{2l^2na^2c}-l^3a^3+lm^2ab^2-\cancel{ln^2ac^2}-2lmnabc+l^2ma^2b-m^3b^3+mn^2bc^2)},$$

$$=\frac{1}{k^2(l^2ma^2b+lm^2ab^2+m^2nb^2c+mn^2bc^2+l^2na^2c+ln^2ac^2-l^3a^3-m^3b^3-n^3c^3-2lmnabc)},$$

which is the same found above
(1) when the first term was reduced.

The third fraction, viz. ##\frac{n}{z(ax+by-cz)}## also reduces to the same expression as
(1) above, as I have checked.

Doubt : So I did the problem. However, as you have noticed, I have made use of the auxilliary variable ##k## above, which I equated all the fractions to. Does anyone know a way by which the fractions given can be directly reduced to those required? (That is the method asked for by the authors before the problem).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have not solved it yet but observed that we get another by exchange of variables;
l and x, m and y, n and z in one. And so let
[tex]xa=X,yb=Y,zc=Z,la=L,mb=M,nc=N[/tex] the problem is written as
If
[tex]\frac{X}{L(M+N-L)}=\frac{Y}{M(N+L-M)}=\frac{Z}{N(L+M-N)}=1[/tex]
then prove
[tex]\frac{L}{X(Y+Z-X)}=\frac{M}{Y(Z+X-Y)}=\frac{N}{Z(X+Y-Z)}[/tex]

We can make the first equation equals to 1 without losing generality. By expressing X,Y,Z by M,N,L using the first equation
[tex]X+Y-Z=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)[/tex]
[tex]Y+Z-X=(L+N-M)(L+M-N)[/tex]
[tex]Z+X-Y=(M+L-N)(M+N-L)[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{(Y+Z-X)X}{L}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(Z+X-Y)Y}{M}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(X+Y-Z)Z}{N}=(N+M-L)(N+L-M)(L+M-N)[/tex]
We get the expected result.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Your response (@anuttarasammyak) is similar to what I did in post #1, except that I equated all the fractions given to an arbitrary ##k##.

I post the solution below as given by the authors. It is incredibly well done and, needless to say, very difficult. I struggled at several places to understand what the authors were doing, let alone try and do it myself !

1638882095682.png
 
  • #4
It seems to say 1/2 = 2/4 = (1+2)/(2+4). Smart but I think it is mere a technique .
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Reducing one algebraic fraction to another

What is the process for reducing one algebraic fraction to another?

The process for reducing one algebraic fraction to another involves finding the greatest common factor (GCF) of the numerator and denominator, dividing both by the GCF, and simplifying the resulting fraction if possible.

Why is it important to reduce algebraic fractions?

Reducing algebraic fractions helps to simplify them and make them easier to work with in equations and expressions. It also helps to avoid errors and confusion in calculations.

Can all algebraic fractions be reduced?

No, not all algebraic fractions can be reduced. Some fractions may already be in their simplest form, while others may not have a common factor to reduce by.

How do you know when an algebraic fraction is fully reduced?

An algebraic fraction is fully reduced when the numerator and denominator have no common factors other than 1. In other words, the fraction cannot be simplified any further.

Are there any shortcuts or tricks for reducing algebraic fractions?

Yes, one shortcut for reducing algebraic fractions is to use the distributive property to factor out common terms in the numerator and denominator before dividing by the GCF. Another trick is to look for patterns or common factors in the terms of the fraction.

Back
Top