- #1
member 731016
- Homework Statement
- Please see below. I am trying to find the reduction of order for a second order ODE using an alternative method than shown in the textbook.
- Relevant Equations
- Ansatz ##v(t) = e^{rt}##
For this,
I tried solving the differential equation using an alternative method. My alternative method starts at
##tv^{''} + v^{'} = 0##
I substitute ##v(t) = e^{rt}## into the equation getting,
##tr^2e^{rt} + re^{rt} = 0##
##e^{rt}[tr^2 + r] = 0##
##e^{rt} = 0## or ##tr^2 + r = 0##
Note that ##e^{rt} ≠ 0##
##tr^2 + r = 0##
##r(tr + 1) = 0##
##r = 0## or ##r = -\frac{1}{t}##
Thus, ##v_1 = e^0 = 1## and ##v_2 = e^{-1} = \frac{1}{e}##
Note that ##v_1 = 1## is a trivial solution since it is just ##x_2 = t = x_1##, however, for ##v_2##, we get ##x_2 = \frac{t}{e}##.
However, ##x_2 = \frac{t}{e}## is just another multiple of ##x_1##. Is it possible to get ##t\log_e(t)## using my method?
Thanks.
Any help greatly appreciated - Chiral.
I tried solving the differential equation using an alternative method. My alternative method starts at
##tv^{''} + v^{'} = 0##
I substitute ##v(t) = e^{rt}## into the equation getting,
##tr^2e^{rt} + re^{rt} = 0##
##e^{rt}[tr^2 + r] = 0##
##e^{rt} = 0## or ##tr^2 + r = 0##
Note that ##e^{rt} ≠ 0##
##tr^2 + r = 0##
##r(tr + 1) = 0##
##r = 0## or ##r = -\frac{1}{t}##
Thus, ##v_1 = e^0 = 1## and ##v_2 = e^{-1} = \frac{1}{e}##
Note that ##v_1 = 1## is a trivial solution since it is just ##x_2 = t = x_1##, however, for ##v_2##, we get ##x_2 = \frac{t}{e}##.
However, ##x_2 = \frac{t}{e}## is just another multiple of ##x_1##. Is it possible to get ##t\log_e(t)## using my method?
Thanks.
Any help greatly appreciated - Chiral.