Reference Frames in Simultaneity

In summary: However, if the platform observer sees the ball hit the end of the train at 10:00 pm, the person on the train would say the ball hit the end of the train at 1:00 pm. I don't understand your point. If you are only talking about low, non-relativistic speeds, then there's no time dilation or length contraction to worry about. Time is not slowing down (or speeding up) for anyone. All observers will say that the ball takes the same amount of time to travel from one end of the train to the other.
  • #1
am2010
15
0
Lets say that a person in a moving train throws a ball in the direction of motion from one end and hits the other end of the train at 10 mph (relative to the person on the train). According to special relativity, from the perspective of a platform observer though they would see the ball having to take marginally longer to reach the other end of the train thus according to the platform's frame, time is different.

However for objects that are traveling at 10mph wouldn't it be the case that (from the platform observer's frame) since the train is moving as well the velocities of the ball is NOT 10mph but instead 10 mph + the train's velocity (Law of Relative Motion). Wouldn't this addition in speed then compensate for the slowing down of time so that the platform observer would see the ball reaching the other end of the train at the same time as the person in the train.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
am2010 said:
However for objects that are traveling at 10mph wouldn't it be the case that (from the platform observer's frame) since the train is moving as well the velocities of the ball is NOT 10mph but instead 10 mph + the train's velocity (Law of Relative Motion). Wouldn't this addition in speed then compensate for the slowing down of time so that the platform observer would see the ball reaching the other end of the train at the same time as the person in the train.
You are correct that with respect to the platform, the speed of the ball is not 10 mph but faster due to the speed of the train itself. But it's not simply 10 mph + the train's velocity. One must add velocities using the relativistic law of velocity addition, which looks like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

Instead of this (which is only good for low speeds):

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

There are other factors to consider, such as length contraction: With respect to the platform, the train is shorter.
 
  • #3
Doc Al said:
You are correct that with respect to the platform, the speed of the ball is not 10 mph but faster due to the speed of the train itself. But it's not simply 10 mph + the train's velocity. One must add velocities using the relativistic law of velocity addition, which looks like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

Instead of this (which is only good for low speeds):

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

There are other factors to consider, such as length contraction: With respect to the platform, the train is shorter.

Since we're dealing with low speeds (ball at 10 mph and the train at an even lower speed) then I would use the bottom equation. Since we add the velocities using this relativistic law, isn't it correct that the platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train. Thus time is speeding up for the platform observer?
 
  • #4
am2010 said:
Since we're dealing with low speeds (ball at 10 mph and the train at an even lower speed) then I would use the bottom equation. Since we add the velocities using this relativistic law, isn't it correct that the platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train. Thus time is speeding up for the platform observer?
I don't understand your point. If you are only talking about low, non-relativistic speeds, then there's no time dilation or length contraction to worry about. Time is not slowing down (or speeding up) for anyone. All observers will say that the ball takes the same amount of time to travel from one end of the train to the other.

What do you mean when you say that the "platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train"?

There's no problem in having everyone's clock synchronized. If the person on the train says the ball hit the end of the train at 1:00 pm, the platform observer will agree.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Reference Frames in Simultaneity

What is a reference frame?

A reference frame is a set of coordinates used to describe the position and motion of an object or event. It serves as a point of reference for measuring and comparing the motion of other objects or events.

What is the concept of simultaneity?

Simultaneity is the concept of events happening at the same time in different reference frames. It is relative and can change depending on the observer's perspective and reference frame.

How do reference frames affect simultaneity?

Reference frames can affect simultaneity because an event that is considered simultaneous in one reference frame may not be simultaneous in another. This is due to the fact that the speed of light is constant and the time it takes for light to travel can vary depending on the reference frame.

What is the role of the speed of light in reference frames and simultaneity?

The speed of light is a fundamental constant in reference frames and simultaneity. It is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. It also serves as a universal reference point for measuring time and space.

How can the concept of reference frames and simultaneity be applied in real-world situations?

Reference frames and simultaneity have important applications in fields such as physics, astronomy, and navigation. They are essential for understanding the behavior of objects and events in the universe, and for making accurate measurements and predictions about their motion and interactions.

Back
Top