Reflection and Transmission of String Waves

  • #1
Ark236
26
3
Homework Statement
Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations
y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)
To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ark236 said:
Homework Statement: Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations: y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)

To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
If A_t is the amplitude of the transmitted wave then
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) should be
y_t = A_t sin(k2x - wt).

Edit. Also "y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)" can not be correct as it is inhomogeneous. The left side has the dimension of length but the right side is dimensionless.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
thanks, I made a mistake when copying the calculation. y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)y_i and y_t = A_t sin(k2 x - wt). However, if mu2>mu1 i expect that y_r will negative since the reflected wave is inverted.
 
  • #4
You wrote the incident and reflected waves as $$y_i = A_i \sin(k_1x - \omega t)$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(k_1x+ \omega t)$$ Consider ##x = 0## for these two equations. If ##A_i## and ##A_r## are both positive, is the reflected wave inverted relative to the incident wave or not inverted?

Some books write the waves as ##y = A \sin(wt \pm kx)## with the ##\omega t## coming first in the argument of the sine function. In this case consider the incident and reflected waves written as $$y_i = A_i \sin(\omega t -k_1x )$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t+k_1x )$$ Now is the reflected wave inverted if both ##A_i## and ##A_r## are positive?
 
  • Like
Likes vela
  • #5
I deleted my reply as I decided it was confusing.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Ark236 said:
1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_t(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_t/dx |_(x = 0)
These equations are to hold at all instants of time.

Ark236 said:
The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2.
You should be looking for equations relating ##A_i##, ##A_r##, and ##A_t##. You need to solve for ##A_r## and ##A_t## in terms of ##A_i##.
 
  • #7
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
 
  • #8
Ark236 said:
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
In the case where you are using ##y = A\sin(kx \pm\omega t)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have the same sign. See the first paragraph of post #4.

If you use ##y = A\sin(\omega t \pm kx)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have opposite sign.

It might help to note that ##\sin(\omega t - kx) = -\sin(kx - \omega t)##, but ##\sin(\omega t + kx) = +\sin(kx + \omega t)##
 
  • #9
Thank you very much :D.
 
Back
Top