MHB Related Rates: Conical Pile of Sand | Vampire_thirst Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
AI Thread Summary
Sand is falling onto a conical pile at a rate of 30 m³/min, with the height of the pile equal to its base diameter. The volume of the pile can be expressed as a function of height and radius, leading to two key equations for related rates. When the pile is 8 m high, the height is increasing at approximately 0.597 m/min, while the radius is increasing at about 0.298 m/min. These rates were derived through implicit differentiation of the volume equations with respect to time. The calculations provide insights into how the dimensions of the sand pile change over time.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Another related rates problem?


Sand falls from a conveyor belt at a rate of 30 m^3/min onto the top of a conical pile. The height of the pile is always the same as the base diameter. Answer the following.

a.) How fast is the height changing when the pile is 8 m high?
Answer = m/min.

b.) How fast is the radius changing when the pile is 8 m high?
Answer = m/min.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello vampire_thirst,

The statement:

"Sand falls from a conveyor belt at a rate of 30 m^3/min..."

tells us regarding the rate of change of the volume of the pile of sand:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}}$$

That is, the volume of the pile is increasing at a rate of 30 cubic meters per minute.

The statement:

"The height of the pile is always the same as the base diameter"

tells us:

$$h=2r$$

And so, using the formula for the volume of a cone:

$$V=\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2h$$

we find:

(1) The volume as a function of the height $h$:

$$V(h)=\frac{1}{3}\pi \left(\frac{h}{2} \right)^2(h)=\frac{1}{12}\pi h^3$$

(2) The volume as a function of the base radius $r$:

$$V(r)=\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2(2r)=\frac{2}{3}\pi r^3$$

a.) How fast is the height changing when the pile is 8 m high?

If we implicitly differentiate (1) with respect to time $t$, we obtain:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{1}{4}\pi h^2\frac{dh}{dt}$$

Since we are asked to find how fast the height of the pile is increasing, we want to solve for $$\frac{dh}{dt}$$:

$$\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{4}{\pi h^2}\frac{dV}{dt}$$

Now, using the given data:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}},\,h=8\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{4}{\pi \left(8\text{ m} \right)^2}\left(30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}} \right)=\frac{15}{8\pi}\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}\approx0.596831036594608\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$

b.) How fast is the radius changing when the pile is 8 m high?

If we implicitly differentiate (2) with respect to time $t$, we obtain:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=2\pi r^2\frac{dr}{dt}$$

Since we are asked to find how fast the base radius of the pile is increasing, we want to solve for $$\frac{dr}{dt}$$:

$$\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{1}{2\pi r^2}\frac{dV}{dt}$$

Now, using the given data:

$$\frac{dV}{dt}=30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}},\,r=4\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{1}{2\pi \left(4\text{ m} \right)^2}\left(30\frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{min}} \right)=\frac{15}{16\pi}\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}\approx0.298415518297304\frac{\text{m}}{\text{min}}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top