Relative velocity and momentum?

Click For Summary
In the discussion about a logger walking on a floating log, participants debated how to apply conservation of momentum to determine the log's velocity relative to the water. One participant calculated the log's speed as 0.34 m/s, while another found it to be 0.28 m/s, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The key point emphasized was that the center of mass of the system must remain stationary, meaning the log must move in the opposite direction to the logger's movement. Clarification was sought on whether to consider the mass of both the logger and the log or just the log when calculating momentum. Ultimately, the discussion highlighted the importance of understanding the relationship between the logger's speed and the log's counteracting motion to maintain momentum conservation.
buckyball
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Some friends and I were working on some physics questions and when it came to this one, we all got different answers.

An 90 kg logger is standing on a 400 kg log floating at rest in a pond. The logger starts to
walk along the log at 1.5 m/s relative to the water. How fast is the log moving relative to
the water?


Homework Equations


One friend and I used conservation of momentum .

I used: (m1 + m2)(0) = m1(1.2) + m2(v')
She used: (m1+m2)(0) = m1(1.2) + (m1+m2)(v')



The Attempt at a Solution


I got 0.34 m/s and my friend got 0.28 m/s. Are either of us right?

Thank-you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Remember that the center of mass of the system will not move.

What condition then must be met such that this is accomplished? That is how fast must the center of mass of the log move counter to the movement of the logger?
 
Are you saying that the velocity will be 1.5 m/s in the opposite direction of the logger?
 
I've been thinking more about it. The logger and the log is at rest, so the center of mass of the system is zero. Once the logger moves in one direction along the length of the log, he is moving at 1.2 m/s.

I understand that if you use conservation of momentum, that the log must move in the opposite direction as the logger, but that is where my friends and I cannot agree on.

Do we use the mass of the logger and log moving in the opposite direction of the logger since the logger is still on the log? Or do you just use the mass of the log moving the other direction since the logger is moving in the other direction.

Any more clarification would be great! Thank-you.

DG.
 
buckyball said:
I've been thinking more about it. The logger and the log is at rest, so the center of mass of the system is zero. Once the logger moves in one direction along the length of the log, he is moving at 1.2 m/s.

I understand that if you use conservation of momentum, that the log must move in the opposite direction as the logger, but that is where my friends and I cannot agree on.

Do we use the mass of the logger and log moving in the opposite direction of the logger since the logger is still on the log? Or do you just use the mass of the log moving the other direction since the logger is moving in the other direction.

Any more clarification would be great! Thank-you.

DG.

The center of mass of the system is made from the two centers of mass - the log, the runner.

If momentum is conserved, and the velocity of the runner is defined, then you know the momentum of the runner. If the center of mass remains constant then won't the center of mass of just the log need to move in the opposite direction at a speed that conserves momentum?
 
Here's something to think about: the total momentum of the system is the momentum of the log, plus the momentum of the logger. So when you use conservation of momentum, calculate the momentum of each separately, and add them up. All velocities should be taken relative to a common reference point (usually the ground).
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K