Relativity of Length: Understanding Length Contraction & Time Dilation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Rios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of length contraction and time dilation in the context of a particle moving at relativistic speeds. It highlights the confusion surrounding the calculations of proper length (L_0) and proper time (delta_t_0) as perceived from different frames of reference. The calculations reveal that the length measured in the particle's frame is indeed less than that measured from the Earth's frame, aligning with the principles of relativity. Additionally, it emphasizes that in the particle's rest frame, the Earth moves, not the particle itself, which clarifies the misunderstanding regarding the motion in different frames. Overall, the conversation reinforces the importance of correctly applying relativistic equations to avoid misconceptions.
Fernando Rios
Messages
96
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
An unstable particle is created in the upper atmosphere from
a cosmic ray and travels straight down toward the surface of the
earth with a speed of relative to the earth. A scientist at
rest on the earth’s surface measures that the particle is created at an
altitude of a) As measured by the scientist, how much
time does it take the particle to travel the to the surface of
the earth? b) Use the length contraction formula to calculate the distance
from where the particle is created to the surface of the earth as
measured in the particle’s frame. c) In the particle’s frame, how
much time does it take the particle to travel from where it is created
to the surface of the earth? Calculate this time both by the time dilation
formula and also from the distance calculated in part (b). Do
the two results agree?
Relevant Equations
delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
a) We use the definition of speed:
v = delta_L/delta_t

delta_t = delta_L/v = 45000 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.55*10^-4 s

b) We use the length contraction equation:
delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L_0 = delta_L/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m/sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 469698 m

However, the solution shows the following:
L_0 = delta_L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m*sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 4310 m

Shouldn't the length in the particle's frame be greater?

c) We use the time dilation equation:
delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_t_0 = delta_t*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = (1.51*10^-4 s)*sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 1.44*10^-5 s

We use the definition of velocity:
v = L_0/delta_t_0

delta_t_0 = L_0/v = 469698 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.51*10^-4 s

However, the solution shows the following:
delta_t_0 = L_0/v = 4310 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.44*10^-4 s

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fernando Rios said:
a) We use the definition of speed:
v = delta_L/delta_t
t= L_0 / v
because distance is still at the Earth. I read ##L_0=45,000 \ m##
Fernando Rios said:
b) We use the length contraction equation:
delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L_0 = delta_L/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m/sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 469698 m
L is distance measured in particle frame of reference
L=L_0 \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}=\frac{L_0}{ \gamma}
I read ##v=0.9954c,\ \gamma=10.44##

I will leave the followings to you.
 
Fernando Rios said:
Homework Statement:: An unstable particle is created in the upper atmosphere from
a cosmic ray and travels straight down toward the surface of the
earth with a speed of relative to the earth. A scientist at
rest on the earth’s surface measures that the particle is created at an
altitude of a) As measured by the scientist, how much
time does it take the particle to travel the to the surface of
the earth? b) Use the length contraction formula to calculate the distance
from where the particle is created to the surface of the Earth as
measured in the particle’s frame. c) In the particle’s frame, how
much time does it take the particle to travel from where it is created
to the surface of the earth? Calculate this time both by the time dilation
formula and also from the distance calculated in part (b). Do
the two results agree?
Relevant Equations:: delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

Shouldn't the length in the particle's frame be greater?
No. The rest frame of the distance is the Earth’s rest frame. It is therefore contracted in the particle’s rest frame.

Also note that part (c) of the statement is badly formulated.
”In the particle’s frame, how much time does it take the particle to travel”
The particle is at rest in its rest frame and therefore does not travel in that frame by definition. In that frame, it is the Earth’s surface that travels.
 
Thank you for your answer. It really helped me.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top