Relaxation time and average electron velocity in Drude model

In summary: Thus the relaxation time is the time it takes for the average electron velocity to decay to the average velocity acquired before the collision.
  • #1
Sunny Singh
19
1
If τ is the relaxation time, τ means, on average the time between two collisions for an electron moving under a constant electric field inside a metal. Now according to the assumptions of drude model, the electron acquires an additional velocity of [tex]\frac{-eEt}{m}[/tex]where t is the time elapsed since its last collision. The average velocity of the electron between time t=0 and t=τ (since an average electron spends time τ under acceleration) must be [tex]\frac{-eE}{m}\frac{1}{τ} \int_{0}^{τ} t dt=\frac{-eEτ}{2m}[/tex] but in all the books, they simply write <t>=τ and hence the average electron velocity becomes [tex]\frac{-eEτ}{m}[/tex]I don't understand how they can write this if they really mean τ to be the time it takes, on average for an electron to collide with another ion. Doesn't this make their definition of average velocity to be maximum velocity acquired by electrons? And if so how can this maximum velocity of an electron be used to find the current density? I think I'm confused here at something very basic about averages. Please explain me the point where I'm messing up the logic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Drude model assumes non-interacting electrons moving in the positive background with some friction. The EoM thus is
$$m \dot{\vec{v}}=q \vec{E} -m \gamma \vec{v}.$$
In the DC case you have
$$\vec{v}=\frac{q}{m \gamma} \vec{E}.$$
Further
$$\vec{j} = q n \vec{v}=\frac{q^2 n}{m \gamma} \vec{E},$$
where ##n## is the conduction-electron-number density. From this the el. conductivity is
$$\sigma=\frac{q^3 n}{m \gamma}.$$
The relaxation time is ##\tau=1/\gamma##. It's the average free time. The distribution of the free time is
$$P(t)=N \exp(-\gamma t).$$
Normalization
$$\int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t P(t)=\frac{N}{\gamma}=1 \;\Rightarrow \; N=\gamma.$$
From this
$$\langle t \rangle = \int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t P(t)=-\gamma \partial_{\gamma} \int_0^{\infty} \exp(-\gamma t)=-\gamma \partial_{\gamma} \frac{1}{\gamma}=\frac{1}{\gamma}=\tau.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Sunny Singh

FAQ: Relaxation time and average electron velocity in Drude model

What is the Drude model and how does it relate to relaxation time and average electron velocity?

The Drude model is a simplified classical model that describes the behavior of electrons in a metal. It assumes that electrons move freely through the metal and collide with the metal ions, causing them to scatter. The relaxation time in this model refers to the average time between collisions, while the average electron velocity is the average speed at which the electrons move through the metal.

How is the relaxation time calculated in the Drude model?

In the Drude model, the relaxation time is calculated by dividing the average time between collisions by the total number of collisions. This can be represented by the formula: τ = m/ρe^2, where m is the mass of the electron, ρ is the density of the metal, and e is the charge of an electron.

What factors affect the relaxation time in the Drude model?

The relaxation time in the Drude model is affected by several factors, including the density of the metal, the mass of the electron, and the strength of the electron-phonon interactions. Additionally, impurities and defects in the metal can also affect the relaxation time.

How does the average electron velocity change with temperature in the Drude model?

In the Drude model, the average electron velocity is directly proportional to the temperature of the metal. As the temperature increases, the average electron velocity also increases. This is because at higher temperatures, the electrons have more kinetic energy and can move faster through the metal.

Is the Drude model an accurate representation of electron behavior in metals?

No, the Drude model is a simplified model and does not fully capture the complex behavior of electrons in metals. It neglects important quantum mechanical effects and does not take into account the interactions between electrons. However, it is still a useful model for understanding some basic properties of metals, such as electrical conductivity.

Back
Top