MHB Remarks by Fortney Following Theorems on Directional Derivative ....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding remarks by Jon Pierre Fortney regarding the equation of a plane through a specific point on the graph of a function, as presented in his book on differential forms. The equation is derived from the general plane equation through the origin, which is then translated to pass through the point (x_0, y_0, f(x_0, y_0)). This translation involves replacing the variables x, y, and z to reflect the new point, resulting in the equation z - f(x_0, y_0) = m_x(x - x_0) + m_y(y - y_0). Participants express appreciation for the clarity of this explanation, indicating that the derivation is straightforward once understood. The discussion effectively clarifies the mathematical concept of translating plane equations in the context of differential calculus.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Jon Pierre Fortney's book: A Visual Introduction to Differential Forms and Calculus on Manifolds ... and am currently focused on Chapter 2: An Introduction to Differential Forms ...I need help to understand some remarks by Fortney following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 on the directional derivative ...

Those remarks by Fortney read as follows: (for more text showing the context of the remarks including the two Theorems ... see scanned text below ...)View attachment 8776
In the above text by Fortney we read the following:

" ... ... From this it is straightforward to show that the equation of a plane through the point $$(x_0, y_0, f( x_0, y_0) )$$ on the graph of $$f$$ is given by

$$z - f( x_0, y_0) = m_x ( x - x_0 ) + m_y ( y - y_0 )$$
... ... "Can someone please explain/demonstrate exactly how the above equation arises or comes about ...?
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter========================================================================================So as to make clear the context of the above qestion I am providing Fortney's text before and after the text provided above ... as follows:View attachment 8777
View attachment 8776
View attachment 8778Hope that helps ...Peter
 

Attachments

  • Fortney - 2 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2  ... PART 2 .png
    Fortney - 2 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 ... PART 2 .png
    32.7 KB · Views: 129
  • Fortney - 2 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2  ... PART 2 .png
    Fortney - 2 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 ... PART 2 .png
    32.7 KB · Views: 125
  • Fortney -  1 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2  ... PART 1 .png
    Fortney - 1 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 ... PART 1 .png
    21.1 KB · Views: 123
  • Fortney - 3 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2  ... PART 3 .png
    Fortney - 3 - Remarks following Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 ... PART 3 .png
    39.8 KB · Views: 122
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In the above text by Fortney we read the following:

" ... ... From this it is straightforward to show that the equation of a plane through the point $$(x_0, y_0, f( x_0, y_0) )$$ on the graph of $$f$$ is given by

$$z - f( x_0, y_0) = m_x ( x - x_0 ) + m_y ( y - y_0 )$$
... ... "Can someone please explain/demonstrate exactly how the above equation arises or comes about ...?

Do you already understand where the equation given for a plane through the origin comes from? If so, it's just a translation!
Fortney gives that the equation for a plane through the origin is...
$z = m_xx + m_yy$
Note that what we have here is...
$(z-z_0) = m_x(x-x_0) + m_y(y-y_0)$ where $(x_0, y_0, z_0) = (0, 0, 0)$ (the origin).

So in order to get a plane through our point $(x_0, y_0, f(x_0, y_0))$, we can translate the origin to this point by simply replacing $x$ with $x-x_0$, $y$ with $y-y_0$, and $z$ with $z-z_0$, giving us
$z - f(x_0, y_0) = m_x(x-x_0) + m_y(y-y_0)$
 
joypav said:
Do you already understand where the equation given for a plane through the origin comes from? If so, it's just a translation!
Fortney gives that the equation for a plane through the origin is...
$z = m_xx + m_yy$
Note that what we have here is...
$(z-z_0) = m_x(x-x_0) + m_y(y-y_0)$ where $(x_0, y_0, z_0) = (0, 0, 0)$ (the origin).

So in order to get a plane through our point $(x_0, y_0, f(x_0, y_0))$, we can translate the origin to this point by simply replacing $x$ with $x-x_0$, $y$ with $y-y_0$, and $z$ with $z-z_0$, giving us
$z - f(x_0, y_0) = m_x(x-x_0) + m_y(y-y_0)$
Thanks joypav ...

Yes ... follow that ... straightforward when you see how ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K